On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 08:29:06PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 08:14 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 07:26:45PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>On 11/20/2015 04:08 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:30:43PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 06:13 AM,
On 11/20/2015 08:14 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 07:26:45PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/20/2015 04:08 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:30:43PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/20/2015 06:13 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:49:37PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 07:26:45PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 04:08 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:30:43PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>On 11/20/2015 06:13 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:49:37PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> while xfstesting, this
On 11/20/2015 04:08 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:30:43PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/20/2015 06:13 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:49:37PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
while xfstesting, this bug[1] is spotted by both btrfs/061 and btrfs/063,
so those sub-stripe wri
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:30:43PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 06:13 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:49:37PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> >>while xfstesting, this bug[1] is spotted by both btrfs/061 and btrfs/063,
> >>so those sub-stripe writes are gatherred into plug ca
On 11/20/2015 06:13 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:49:37PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
while xfstesting, this bug[1] is spotted by both btrfs/061 and btrfs/063,
so those sub-stripe writes are gatherred into plug callback list and
hopefully we can have a full stripe writes.
However,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:06:33PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 09:57:49AM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 08:13:58AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:49:37PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > > > while xfstesting, this bug[1] is spotted by both b
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 09:57:49AM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 08:13:58AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:49:37PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > > while xfstesting, this bug[1] is spotted by both btrfs/061 and btrfs/063,
> > > so those sub-stripe writes are gat
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 08:13:58AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:49:37PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > while xfstesting, this bug[1] is spotted by both btrfs/061 and btrfs/063,
> > so those sub-stripe writes are gatherred into plug callback list and
> > hopefully we can have a f
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:49:37PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> while xfstesting, this bug[1] is spotted by both btrfs/061 and btrfs/063,
> so those sub-stripe writes are gatherred into plug callback list and
> hopefully we can have a full stripe writes.
>
> However, while processing these plugged callb
while xfstesting, this bug[1] is spotted by both btrfs/061 and btrfs/063,
so those sub-stripe writes are gatherred into plug callback list and
hopefully we can have a full stripe writes.
However, while processing these plugged callbacks, it's within an atomic
context which is provided by blk_sq_ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
