On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:20:11 +0800
Qu Wenruo wrote:
> You're correct, the kernel is using new schema, btrfs_get_fs_root(),
> which only requires root objectid and completely get rid of the
> offset/type, which is far less possible to call with wrong parameters.
>
> It would be a good timing to
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:09:14 +0800
Qu Wenruo wrote:
> On 2021/2/10 上午1:33, Marek Behún wrote:
> > When the btrfs_read_fs_root() function is searching a ROOT_ITEM with
> > location key offset other than -1, it currently fails via BUG_ON.
> >
> > The offset can have other value than -1, though. Thi
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:47:58 +0100
David Sterba wrote:
> If it's a series then please mention u-boot in the cover letter, no need
> to change the patches, I'll go check CC if I'm too confused about the
> patch.
I would suggest using subject prefix [PATCH u-boot]
Hello,
I cannot find this in the documentation (and the sources are too long),
so I am trying here:
can a file_extent_item with
item.type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_REG
and
item.compression != BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE
have non zero offset (item.offset != 0) ?
What does it mean in such a case? That com
