Re: raid1: cannot add disk to replace faulty because can only mount fs as read-only.

2017-02-07 Thread Hans Deragon
like disallowing root to run mkfs over an existing filesystem because people could erase data by mistake. Let people do what they want and let them live with the consequences. hdparm has a --yes-i-know-what-i-am-doing flag. btrfs needs one. Whoever decides about btrfs features to add, please consider this one. Best regards, Hans Deragon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: raid1: cannot add disk to replace faulty because can only mount fs as read-only.

2017-01-31 Thread Hans Deragon
On 2017-01-30 07:18, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 2017-01-28 04:17, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >> 27.01.2017 23:03, Austin S. Hemmelgarn пишет: >>> On 2017-01-27 11:47, Hans Deragon wrote: >>>> On 2017-01-24 14:48, Adam Borowski wrote: >>>> >>&g

Re: raid1: cannot add disk to replace faulty because can only mount fs as read-only.

2017-01-27 Thread Hans Deragon
On 2017-01-24 14:48, Adam Borowski wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 01:57:24PM -0500, Hans Deragon wrote: If I remove 'ro' from the option, I cannot get the filesystem mounted because of the following error: BTRFS: missing devices(1) exceeds the limit(0), writeable mount is not allow

raid1: cannot add disk to replace faulty because can only mount fs as read-only.

2017-01-24 Thread Hans Deragon
rent state of affair. Am I right? Best regards and thank you for your contribution to the open source movement, Hans Deragon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at ht