Let me repeat what I expressed five years ago.
The redesign of Lincoln Station to a populated Town Center
would need substantial infrastructure development like
two lane roads, open areas, parking spaces and playgrounds.
I visited Newton Center yesterday. This place was a sleepy
corner when we wer
exclude wetlands and a 50' buffer. That is how
>>the HCA Option C model is being submitted
>>- Lincoln has a requirement of 100' setback for wetlands
>>
>> *We are submitting a plan to the State saying: "We propose to meet our
>> 635 minimum r
-- Forwarded message -
C model is being submitted
>>>>>>>- Lincoln has a requirement of 100' setback for wetlands
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *We are submitting a plan to the State saying: "We propose to meet
>>>>>>> our 635 m
evious 15, if they were simultaneously planning
>>>>> to lower the number we use for modeling. It really seems from the outside
>>>>> like they were pushing us to develop the DPW and wetland buffer areas.
>>>>> Perhaps people with more knowledge of wha
vening, is telling us that compliance is mandatory.
>>>>>> This is the same legal counsel whose partner is giving another town the
>>>>>> opposite advice we are receiving. We need independent legal advice,not
>>>>>> advice from one whose continuing employment depends on individuals with
>>&
formed Option C with the changes I have underlined. While
>>> undoubtedly better than what was presented to residents, it is still a very
>>> problematic proposal. I am happy to say that I am working on a set of
>>> compliant proposals with a group of motivated smart Lincoln
d a 50' buffer. That is how
>>the HCA Option C model is being submitted
>>- Lincoln has a requirement of 100' setback for wetlands
>>
>> *We are submitting a plan to the State saying: "We propose to meet our
>> 635 minimum required units with t
r
> documents are not. Please see below for "error message".
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 2:09 PM Joan Kimball wrote:
>
> Hi
> Title V is different from the wetlsnd protection act.
>
> Title V deals with septic systems which also has setback requirements th
oln on behalf of maureen <
> maur...@mochuck.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 25, 2023 2:14 PM
> *To:* Robert Ahlert ; Carl Angiolillo <
> carlangioli...@gmail.com>; Lincoln Talk
> *Subject:* Re: [LincolnTalk] HCA & Codman Road
>
> I agree with including "Not Compl
o think we can apply our local 100'
buffer.
Link to State wetland
protectionshttps://www.mass.gov/info-details/wetlands-program-policy-86-1-title-5-and-the-wetlands-protection-act<http://www.mass.gov/info-details/wetlands-program-policy-86-1-title-5-and-the-wetlands-protection-act>
-- Forwa
ic,
> > > > > > > > > thoughtful way.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > David Cuetos
> > > > > > > > > Weston Rd
> > > > > > > > >
> > >
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> democratic, thoughtful way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David Cuetos
>>>>>>> Weston Rd
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 3:33 PM Karla Gravis
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>&
following: *"The multi-family zoning
>>>>>> districts required by Section 3A should encourage the development of
>>>>>> multi-family housing projects of a scale, density and aesthetic that are
>>>>>> compatible with existing surrounding use
sage".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 2:09 PM Joan Kimball >>>>> <mailto:selene...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>> Ti
ate, according to the model rules, we
>>>>>> are submitting with a 50' buffer. Once it is approved by the State with
>>>>>> a 50' buffer, it would be difficult for us to think we can apply our
>>>>>> local 100' buffer.
>>>>&g
coln ordinance.
>>>>
>>>> By submitting Option C to the State, according to the model rules, we
>>>> are submitting with a 50' buffer. Once it is approved by the State with a
>>>> 50' buffer, it would be difficult for us to think
gov/info-details/wetlands-program-policy-86-1-title-5-and-the-wetlands-protection-act
>>
>> <http://www.mass.gov/info-details/wetlands-program-policy-86-1-title-5-and-the-wetlands-protection-act>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- For
I realize now that you were talking about the links embedded in the
document which are, indeed, broken.
Sorry for the confusion.
Rich
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 6:26 PM Rich Rosenbaum wrote:
>
> *Thank you, but the link to access the town’s model submission does not
>> work. *
>>
>
> It seems to
t for us to think we can apply our local 100'
>>>> buffer.
>>>>
>>>> Link to State wetland
>>>> protectionshttps://www.mass.gov/info-details/wetlands-program-policy-86-1-title-5-and-the-wetlands-protection-act
>>>>
&
gt;> protectionshttps://www.mass.gov/info-details/wetlands-program-policy-86-1-title-5-and-the-wetlands-protection-act
>>
>> <http://www.mass.gov/info-details/wetlands-program-policy-86-1-title-5-and-the-wetlands-protection-act>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
> *Thank you, but the link to access the town’s model submission does not
> work. *
>
It seems to work for me (I tried it on 4 different web browsers). It *is* a
large file (~12 Mb).
Try cut and pasting the link into your browser::
https://www.lincolntown.org/DocumentCenter/View/85116/2023-SOTT
: Monday, October 16, 2023 1:09 PMTo: Linda McMillanCc: David Onigman; Lincoln TalkSubject: Re: [LincolnTalk] HCA & Codman Road A lot of references have been made to “ site review.”It would be helpful to have an official definition, including all the regulatory conditions that can be deployed in
– a
much quieter route than Codman Rd.!
Jennie
Bowles Terrace
From: Lincoln On Behalf Of Jeff B
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2023 11:43 AM
To: David Onigman
Cc: lincoln@lincolntalk.org
Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] HCA & Codman Road
David,
Looking at the town's GIS, it looks t
Hi Jeff,You have taken the words out of my mouth and that is the sentiment I feel! Thank you for saying it!Susanna SzetoOn Oct 16, 2023, at 2:05 PM, Jeff B wrote:David,Looking at the town's GIS, it looks to me like your 2.8 acre plot could definitely have a much larger footprint than the existin
Cover Art 9780240811123_AntennaZoning
From: Lincoln [mailto:lincoln-boun...@lincolntalk.org] On Behalf Of Sara Mattes
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2023 1:09 PM
To: Linda McMillan
Cc: David Onigman; Lincoln Talk
Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] HCA & Codman Road
A lot of references have been made to “
David,
Looking at the town's GIS, it looks to me like your 2.8 acre plot could
definitely have a much larger footprint than the existing house, even with
the wetlands on the property. And at 15 units an acre, it could
potentially house 20+ units? What was your sourcing for the inability to
devel
A lot of references have been made to “ site review.”It would be helpful to have an official definition, including all the regulatory conditions that can be deployed in said review.What enforceable controls does it offer?Something straightforward- bullet points, eg. would be helpful.Sent from my iP
Agree. We'll stated.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, 9:35 AM David Onigman wrote:
> I have been hesitant to engage in the housing discussion on LincolnTalk,
> but after reading a few recent comments about the motives for some of the
> Codman Road residents and their advocacy in favor of the Housing Choice
Thank you David for your clear message. I agree with each town doing
their part to help the housing crisis we are facing. And besides, it's the
law.
Senator Barrett at one point said, we have the jobs and we have workers,
but not adequate housing for them.
I certainly benefit from other towns
30 matches
Mail list logo
