Re: [Patch, fortran] PR85836: Implement the F2018 reduce intrinsic

, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 17:55, Paul Richard Thomas > wrote: > > > > Hi Christophe, > > > > As far as I can tell, the problem with reduce_1.f90 is restricted to one > call to the scalar valued version of the new intrinsic function. When

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR85836: Implement the F2018 reduce intrinsic

goes away for you. In either case, I will seek Jakub Jelnik's help because I have completely run out of ideas. Je vous en remercie d'avance. Paul On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 10:12, Christophe Lyon wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 19:22, Paul Richard Thomas > w

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR85836: Implement the F2018 reduce intrinsic

drawn a total blank with finding a fix. If necessary, I will comment out the offending test. Best regards Paul On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 10:12, Christophe Lyon wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 19:22, Paul Richard Thomas > wrote: > > > > Hi Andre, > > > >

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8650-g94fa9f4d27b: 6 regressions on arm

Hello there, You had previously warned me of the problem with the pre-commit patch, from which I was able to identify the problem. Unfortunately, I screwed up by only correcting the cast of 'dim' in three out of four places. Hans-Peter Nilsson has put it right and I believe that the regression wil

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #93154: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

, Thiago Jung Bauermann < thiago.bauerm...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hello Paul, > > Paul Richard Thomas writes: > > > Thank you very much for your debugging efforts. You really pulled out > the stops. > > You're welcome. In the future if there are other issues or que

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #93154: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

Hi Thiago, Thank you very much for your debugging efforts. You really pulled out the stops. Can I take it then that you will update the toolchain system wide so that I can commit the patch without triggering you every night? It would be a pity to XFAIL it after your efforts. I thought that since

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #93154: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

Hi There, I have been withholding the commit of this patch until I hear from you. Regards Paul On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 08:48, Paul Richard Thomas < paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, > > You detected a failure in gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90: >

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #93154: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

Hi there, You detected a failure in gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90: PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O0 execution test PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O1 (test for excess e

gcc patch #88922: FAIL: 1 regressions on aarch64

Hi, Executing on host: /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/abe/builds/destdir/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gfortran /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr89462.f90 -fdiagnostics-plain-output -fdiagnostics-pl

Pre-commit execution test for pr113363.f90

Hi there, Thanks for the heads-up on gcc patch #88281: 6 regressions on arm. I see from the log that the test timed-out and the core was dumped. I cannot reproduce this and can see nothing in the tree-dump that might cause a time out. I would appreciate some help on where the fault lies and what