Re: [U-Boot] [uboot PATCH v2] Add uboot "fdt_high" enviroment variable

2011-07-14 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:12:25 -0400 David Long wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 03:50 +0900, Grant Likely wrote: > > > > Regardless of this patch, the pandaboard uboot still needs to be > > fixed. Setting an fdt_high variable is useful for debug, but it is not > > a fix. > > > > > Then someone

Re: [U-Boot] [uboot PATCH v2] Add uboot "fdt_high" enviroment variable

2011-07-15 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:20:53 -0400 David Long wrote: > When we boot without specifying an FDT, u-boot does not relocate the > initrd. When we specify an FDT address in RAM, u-boot relocates both. > We do not need that relocation (in this case at least). Well, that does sound strange. I'd think

Re: [U-Boot] [uboot PATCH v2] Add uboot "fdt_high" enviroment variable

2011-07-15 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:09:16 -0400 David Long wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 14:43 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > > You need to use lmb_reserve() to exclude any memory regions that are not > > suitable for boot images -- see powerpc's arch_lmb_reserve() and