Re: valgrind less than useful on arm?

2014-06-17 Thread Will Newton
On 13 June 2014 18:14, Tom Gall wrote: Hi Tom, > I'm trying to use valgrind on an a15, 32 hf environment obviously. > > I have -g on with no optimization for all my code that is being run. > > Command line options for valgrind are: > > valgrind -v --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full --show-reachab

[PATCH] configs: android: Enable SELinux related configs

2014-06-17 Thread Vishal Bhoj
From: Vishal Bhoj Signed-off-by: Vishal Bhoj --- linaro/configs/android.conf | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/linaro/configs/android.conf b/linaro/configs/android.conf index e4fd1ad..50e8ac2 100644 --- a/linaro/configs/android.conf +++ b/linaro/configs/android.con

Re: [PATCH] configs: android: Enable SELinux related configs

2014-06-17 Thread Fathi Boudra
Vishal, 1. against which tree should it be applied? 2. do you want it enabled by default for all android builds? On 17 June 2014 13:57, Vishal Bhoj wrote: > From: Vishal Bhoj > > Signed-off-by: Vishal Bhoj > --- > linaro/configs/android.conf | 10 ++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

Re: [PATCH] configs: android: Enable SELinux related configs

2014-06-17 Thread Vishal Bhoj
Hi, On 17 June 2014 16:41, Fathi Boudra wrote: > Vishal, > > 1. against which tree should it be applied? > I have tested it against TC2 with the LSK tree. I was not sure if the patches directly go to LSK. I thought it should first go into config fragment tree. > 2. do you want it enabled by de

Re: [PATCH] configs: android: Enable SELinux related configs

2014-06-17 Thread Mark Brown
On 17 June 2014 12:18, Vishal Bhoj wrote: > On 17 June 2014 16:41, Fathi Boudra wrote: > >> Vishal, >> >> 1. against which tree should it be applied? >> > I have tested it against TC2 with the LSK tree. I was not sure if the > patches directly go to LSK. I thought it should first go into config

Re: [PATCH] configs: android: Enable SELinux related configs

2014-06-17 Thread Fathi Boudra
On 17 June 2014 14:53, Mark Brown wrote: > On 17 June 2014 12:18, Vishal Bhoj wrote: >> >> On 17 June 2014 16:41, Fathi Boudra wrote: >>> >>> Vishal, >>> >>> 1. against which tree should it be applied? >> >> I have tested it against TC2 with the LSK tree. I was not sure if the >> patches directl

Re: [PATCH] configs: android: Enable SELinux related configs

2014-06-17 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 12:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On 17 June 2014 12:18, Vishal Bhoj wrote: > > > On 17 June 2014 16:41, Fathi Boudra wrote: > > > >> Vishal, > >> > >> 1. against which tree should it be applied? > >> > > I have tested it against TC2 with the LSK tree. I was not sure if the

Re: [PATCH] configs: android: Enable SELinux related configs

2014-06-17 Thread Vishal Bhoj
On 17 June 2014 17:23, Mark Brown wrote: > On 17 June 2014 12:18, Vishal Bhoj wrote: > >> On 17 June 2014 16:41, Fathi Boudra wrote: >> >>> Vishal, >>> >>> 1. against which tree should it be applied? >>> >> I have tested it against TC2 with the LSK tree. I was not sure if the >> patches directl

Re: valgrind less than useful on arm?

2014-06-17 Thread Tom Gall
I'm on 12.04 precise. Bummer. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Will Newton wrote: > On 13 June 2014 18:14, Tom Gall wrote: > > Hi Tom, > >> I'm trying to use valgrind on an a15, 32 hf environment obviously. >> >> I have -g on with no optimization for all my code that is being run. >> >> Command

Re: valgrind less than useful on arm?

2014-06-17 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:17:26 -0500 Tom Gall wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Will Newton wrote: > > On 13 June 2014 18:14, Tom Gall wrote: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > >> I'm trying to use valgrind on an a15, 32 hf environment obviously. > >> > >> I have -g on with no optimization for all my

Re: [PATCH] configs: android: Enable SELinux related configs

2014-06-17 Thread Mark Brown
On 17 June 2014 13:16, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 12:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > I've added him. > > You didn't seem to have, unless this more of the Linaro's lists's > default behaviour of dropping people from CC who are subscribed? Looks like it. It's really broke

Re: valgrind less than useful on arm?

2014-06-17 Thread Tom Gall
Yes I do. I think this might be a debug-file-directory setting issue. The app and one of the libs it's using are in /usr/local/ the debug for libc is in /usr/. Not sure you can have multiple directories in .gdbinit for debug-file-directory. Least it seems to be ignoring it. Figure I'll trying

Re: [PATCH] configs: android: Enable SELinux related configs

2014-06-17 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 14:38 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On 17 June 2014 13:16, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 12:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > I've added him. > > You didn't seem to have, unless this more of the Linaro's > l

Re: [PATCH] configs: android: Enable SELinux related configs

2014-06-17 Thread Peter Maydell
On 17 June 2014 15:07, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > Yes, it's damned annoying as we've found out in the past, but I believe > it's a 'feature', a per subscriber option unless I've got mixed up... > > Avoid duplicate copies of messages? > > When you are listed explicitly in the To:

Re: Seeking deb of upstream qemu + patch series

2014-06-17 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Thanks for the reply! Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar writes: > Hi, > > On 17 June 2014 07:03, Michael Hudson-Doyle > wrote: > >> Michael Hudson-Doyle writes: >> >> > Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar writes: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On 6 June 2014 08:58, Michael Hudson-Doyle >> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >