Le 19 déc. 2012 07:34, "Viresh Kumar" a écrit :
>
> Morten/Vincent,
>
> On 6 December 2012 20:06, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > First of all i must admit, i haven't followed the discussion closely,
as this
> > part of kernel is still rocket science for me :)
> >
> > Secondly, what you said is correct A
On 19 December 2012 14:53, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Le 19 déc. 2012 07:34, "Viresh Kumar" a écrit :
>> Can we resolve this issue now? I don't want anything during the release
>> period
>> this time.
>
> The new version of the patchset should solve the concerns of everybody
Morten,
Can you confi
On 19/12/12 09:34, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 19 December 2012 14:53, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Le 19 déc. 2012 07:34, "Viresh Kumar" a écrit :
Can we resolve this issue now? I don't want anything during the release
period
this time.
The new version of the patchset should solve the concerns of eve
Hi,
The following code fails to build with OE Aarch64 toolchain with
current kernel headers. While ugly, the code is a reduced testcase
from fuse build failure (
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-oe/+bug/1087757 ) and the same fuse
code compiles on all other architectures. Before I send a workarou
Following issues fixed:
1. Name of generated rcport file is powertop*.csv not PowerTop*.csv
2. sudo not available in android so dropped it.
3. ls -1 not supported in android ls command so changed it to plain ls.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
---
powertop/powertop_01.sh |8
1 file c
On 19 December 2012 16:03, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Following issues fixed:
> 1. Name of generated rcport file is powertop*.csv not PowerTop*.csv
> 2. sudo not available in android so dropped it.
> 3. ls -1 not supported in android ls command so changed it to plain ls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chander K
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 04:42:08PM +, Alexander Spyridakis wrote:
> On 18 December 2012 12:10, Liviu Dudau
> mailto:liviu.du...@arm.com>> wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Could you explain with a bit more detail what's the intended usage
> scenario for this code?
>
> If you have BootMonitor, it is
Development for big.LITTLE MP continues in a strong way, however as
our efforts for big.LITTLE IKS ramp up to delivery, process and
project management will focus on that project until the end of the
year. As such, the next big.LITTLE MP status will be sent out in
January.
I will be happy to respon
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Todd Poynor wrote:
>
>> I put this up on AOSP Gerrit at
>> https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/48233/ with a minor change
>> to the semaphore field name to be more descriptive and to identify it
>> as a semaphore.
On 5 December 2012 09:55, John Stultz wrote:
> So while I can try to update the linaro-android tree more frequently,
> maintaining that tree is more of a background task. So when my other
> commitments consume my attention, sometimes that update frequency is slower.
> Also, given we're already 3 r
On 12/19/2012 06:05 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 December 2012 09:55, John Stultz wrote:
So while I can try to update the linaro-android tree more frequently,
maintaining that tree is more of a background task. So when my other
commitments consume my attention, sometimes that update frequency i
11 matches
Mail list logo
