From: "hongbo.zhang"
Signed-off-by: hongbo.zhang
---
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
index cc1c930..b6b4c2a 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
+++ b/drivers/th
From: "hongbo.zhang"
Is is not reliable to check the list entry pointer after
list_for_each_entry loop, list_empty should be used instead.
Signed-off-by: hongbo.zhang
---
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_
From: "hongbo.zhang"
Hi all,
This patch set is to upstream ST-Ericsson thermal driver and fix some bugs
of thermal layer at the same time.
All of these patches are based on v3.7-rc1.
[PATCH 1/5] Thermal: do bind operation after thermal zone or cooling
device register returns.
In the previous
From: "hongbo.zhang"
In the previous bind function, cdev->get_max_state(cdev, &max_state) is called
before the registration function finishes, but at this moment, the parameter
cdev at thermal driver layer isn't ready--it will get ready only after its
registration, so the the get_max_state callba
From: "hongbo.zhang"
The cpufreq works as a cooling device, so the cooling layer should
check and wait until the cpufreq driver is initialized.
Signed-off-by: hongbo.zhang
---
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers
From: "hongbo.zhang"
This diver is based on the thermal management framework in thermal_sys.c.
A thermal zone device is created with the trip points to which cooling
devices can be bound, the current cooling device is cpufreq, e.g. CPU
frequency is clipped down to cool the CPU, and other cooling
On Tuesday 16 of October 2012 09:09:15 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 15 October 2012 23:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 10:12:11 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> Arrays for governer and driver name are of size CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN or 16.
> >> i.e. 15 bytes for name and 1 for traili
On Tuesday 16 of October 2012 06:40:19 MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> > On Monday 08 of October 2012 10:48:24 MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> > > > On 8 October 2012 03:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday 04 of October 2012 14:58:33 Rajagopal Venkat wrote:
> > > > >> Add devfreq suspend/resume apis fo
The agenda for tomorrow's meeting has been posted here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Meetings/2012-10-17
Please take a look, add any agenda items you'd like to talk about and
add your status.
See you tomorrow!
--
Zach Pfeffer
Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams
Linaro
This adds Kconfig options for DEBUG and VERBOSE_DEBUG to the cpufreq subsystem,
This is pretty useful for developers who want to debug cpufreq subsystem and
don't want to editing the Makefile manually each time they want to debug.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 14 +++
With debug options on, it is difficult to locate cpufreq core's debug prints.
Fix this by prefixing debug prints with:
"cpufreq: "
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 ++
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c | 2 ++
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_powersave.c |
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 00:21:28 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The function needs the cpuidle_device which is initially passed to the
> caller.
>
> The current code gets the struct device from the struct cpuidle_device,
> pass it the cpuidle_add_sysfs function. This function calls
> per_cpu(cpuid
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 00:21:29 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Move the kobj initialization and completion in the sysfs.c
> and encapsulate the code more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
I like this one too and I'm going to take it for v3.8 as well.
Thanks,
Rafael
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 00:21:30 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The next patchset providing the multiple drivers support
> will add to the per cpu sysfs driver.
>
> In order to prepare the place this patch creates a single
> entry function when a cpuidle device is added or removed.
>
> Signed-off
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 00:21:31 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The structure cpuidle_state_kobj is not used anywhere except
> in the sysfs.c file. The definition of this function is not
Surely structure?
> needed in the cpuidle header file.
>
On 17 October 2012 11:09, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 10:50 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> With debug options on, it is difficult to locate cpufreq core's debug prints.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> []
>> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>> +#define pr
On 17 October 2012 11:34, Joe Perches wrote:
> I believe you are quoting KBUILD_MODNAME
Yes. :(
Far better output with this. Thanks.
@Rafael: Please consider below patch instead:
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:38:31 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Improve debug prints
With debug
On 17 October 2012 11:56, Joe Perches wrote:
> Oh good, but please use a space between KBUILD_MODNAME
> and the quoted ": ".
Anything technical behind it or just for code formatting? As output is
same in both cases :)
8<--8<---
From: V
On 10/06/2012 02:37 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Minor change to the plan:
> * The current llct is *llct-20121006.0*
> * October 9: ll rebuild based on llct-20121006.0
> * October 16: ll rebuild based on llct-20121012., ll code freeze (no
>massive ll topics updates after th
19 matches
Mail list logo
