On 09/05/2012 03:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, September 01, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Friday, August 31, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 07/24/2012 11:06 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:12:29PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Remov
On 09/06/2012 09:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 03:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Saturday, September 01, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Friday, August 31, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/24/2012 11:06 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at
On 09/03/2012 05:16 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:46:00PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> This patch adds a pointer to the cpuidle_state array in the cpuidle_device
>> structure. When the cpuidle_device is initialized, the pointer is assigned
>> from the driver's cpuidl
Fix timer and work perf events timestamp tracing by
- considering event exit timestamp relative to measurement first
timestamp for events which entry timestamp is not recorded.
Currently these events exit timestamp itself is considered as
usage period resulting in false usage report.
- clearing eve
On 5 September 2012 23:36, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 9/5/2012 10:45 AM, Rajagopal Venkat wrote:
>> On 5 September 2012 22:52, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> On 9/5/2012 10:19 AM, Rajagopal Venkat wrote:
On 5 September 2012 22:39, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 9/5/2012 9:56 AM, Rajagopal
On 9/6/2012 6:42 AM, Rajagopal Venkat wrote:
> (305177)(4380506988525) (4380506988525)
> (4380507324219) (4380507019042) (0)<<<
> (4380507354736) (4380596923827) (4380596893310)
> (4380507415771) (4380606964111) (4380606903076)
Hi Sylwester
Thank you for the review again.
On 5 September 2012 22:56, Sylwester Nawrocki
wrote:
> Hi Sangwook,
>
> On 09/05/2012 02:28 PM, Sangwook Lee wrote:
[snip]
>> +#include
>
> What do we need this header for ?
Ok, let me delete this.
>
>> +
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +#
Hi Viresh,
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 5 September 2012 19:16, Morten Rasmussen
> wrote:
> > The patch is already in the original patch set, so I'm not sure why it
> > is missing.
> >
> >
> http://linux-arm.org/git?p=arm-bls.git;a=commit;h=1416200dd62551aa9ac4aa207b
This patch adds driver for S5K4ECGX sensor with embedded ISP SoC,
S5K4ECGX, which is a 5M CMOS Image sensor from Samsung
The driver implements preview mode of the S5K4ECGX sensor.
capture (snapshot) operation, face detection are missing now.
Following controls are supported:
contrast/saturation/bri
On 4 September 2012 15:57, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> The semihosting and FDT code makes use of libc style string
> functions implemented in our string.c, however it relies of the system
> providing the string.h header file.
>
> This causes problems on toolchains that don't provide these headers
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
---
boot.S| 15 +--
semi_loader.h |6 --
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/boot.S b/boot.S
index 128f74e..fe7acdf 100644
--- a/boot.S
+++ b/boot.S
@@ -96,8 +96,6 @@ start:
mov r7, #0xfff0
Currently, it looks like we rely on luck in order to fall through
to the correct vector when a Hyp Trap exception occurs.
This patch aligns the Hyp mode vector table explicitly to a 32-byte
boundary, as required by the architecture.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
---
boot.S | 24 -
The bootwrapper is really doubling as firmware, so it doesn't make
sense for it to drop out of the Secure World before getting a
chance to parse its parameters and configuration.
Instead, it should make sense to delay switching to the Normal
World for as long as possible so that we have a chance t
* Split Hyp mode entry out into a separate macro.
* hvc now jumps back to the caller in Hyp mode instead of
branching to a fixed label.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin
---
boot.S | 23 +++
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/boot.S b/boot.S
in
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Rajagopal Venkat
wrote:
> Fix timer and work perf events timestamp tracing by
> - considering event exit timestamp relative to measurement first
> timestamp for events which entry timestamp is not recorded.
> Currently these events exit timestamp itself is considere
On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 09:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 09/05/2012 03:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, September 01, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, August 31,
Tixy,
Can you please answer below queries? I am not sure about them.
--
viresh
On 6 September 2012 20:04, Lei Wen wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Viresh Kumar
> wrote:
>>
>> On 5 September 2012 19:16, Morten Rasmussen
>> wrote:
>> > The patch is already in the origina
17 matches
Mail list logo