Re: Deploying new code to snapshots.linaro.org

2012-08-27 Thread Danilo Šegan
Hi Ricardo, Sorry for all the trouble we caused you. У нед, 26. 08 2012. у 07:39 -0300, Ricardo Salveti пише: > Please, avoid landing such intrusive changes at a friday next time, > specially at the friday just before the release :-) Yes, I definitely agree with that. There were some circumsta

Re: Deploying new code to snapshots.linaro.org

2012-08-27 Thread Danilo Šegan
Hi John, У нед, 26. 08 2012. у 17:15 -0600, John Rigby пише: > Probably related or same issue. On the old site I was able to > download hwpacks with for example: > > wget -q -k --no-cookies --header 'Cookie: redirectlicensephp=200' > http://oldsnapshots.linaro.org/precise/hwpacks/lt-snowball/la

Utter lunacy of Linaro "license" protection Re: Deploying new code to snapshots.linaro.org

2012-08-27 Thread Zygmunt Krynicki
W dniu 27.08.2012 18:01, Danilo Šegan pisze: Hi John, У нед, 26. 08 2012. у 17:15 -0600, John Rigby пише: Probably related or same issue. On the old site I was able to download hwpacks with for example: wget -q -k --no-cookies --header 'Cookie: redirectlicensephp=200' http://oldsnapshots.li

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-08-27 Thread Rob Herring
On 08/16/2012 10:35 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini > CC: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org > CC: David Vrabel > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt | 22 ++ > 1

Re: [GIT PULL] bit-LITTLE-MP-v7

2012-08-27 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 24 August 2012 16:39, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > Sounds OK from my point of view, except that rather than fixed dates > each month the should probably be tied to the release dates. E.g. the > Monday of the week before release (the normal WG cut-of date), and two > weeks before (or after?) tha

Re: [GIT PULL] bit-LITTLE-MP-v7

2012-08-27 Thread Amit Kucheria
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24 August 2012 16:39, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: >> Sounds OK from my point of view, except that rather than fixed dates >> each month the should probably be tied to the release dates. E.g. the >> Monday of the week before release (the no