On 12 July 2012 16:59, Scott Bambrough wrote:
> Try the omap4plus_defconfig.
>
There is no such defconfig, only following are present:
omap1_defconfig
omap2plus_defconfig
--
viresh
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.
From: "hongbo.zhang"
Hi all,
This is the ST-Ericsson db8500 thermal dirver, here are some notes of this
patch set:
1.
0001-Remove-un-necessary-variable-checking.patch is a trivial update of the
thermal framework.
0002-ST-Ericsson-db8500-thermal-dirver.patch is the ST-Ericsson db8500 thermal
d
From: "hongbo.zhang"
Signed-off-by: hongbo.zhang
---
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c |3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
index c40d9a0..a8aa10f 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
+++ b/driv
From: "hongbo.zhang"
Signed-off-by: hongbo.zhang
---
arch/arm/configs/u8500_defconfig |4 +
arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500.c | 69
drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 20 ++
drivers/thermal/Makefile |4 +-
drivers/thermal/
On 13/07/12 15:45, the mail apparently from Viresh Kumar included:
On 12 July 2012 16:59, Scott Bambrough mailto:scott.bambro...@linaro.org>> wrote:
Try the omap4plus_defconfig.
There is no such defconfig, only following are present:
omap1_defconfig
omap2plus_defconfig
It looks like thi
On 07/13/2012 11:45 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 12 July 2012 16:59, Scott Bambrough mailto:scott.bambro...@linaro.org>> wrote:
Try the omap4plus_defconfig.
There is no such defconfig, only following are present:
omap1_defconfig
omap2plus_defconfig
Correct. omap4plus_defconfig is in the (
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 12 May 2012 17:40, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
>> implementations using frequency scaling up/down based on the registration
>> parameters. Different cpu related coo
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:20:13 +0200
> From: Lee Jones
> To: "Rajanikanth H.V"
> Cc: STEricsson_nomadik_linux ,
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org, patc...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Implement devicetr
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:12:01 +
> From: Arnd Bergmann
> To: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org,
> "Rajanikanth H.V" ,
patc...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Implement devicetree support for AB8500
> B
We now have a fix for Gator to stop it deadlocking the system on 3.5
kernels [0].
This fix will find it's way into linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) when
Andrey next updates that with the ARM LT topics.
For people managing 3.5 kernels with in-tree Gator code they didn't via
llct then then they ne
@@ -964,11 +966,13 @@ static int __devinit ab8500_btemp_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
{
int irq, i, ret = 0;
u8 val;
- struct abx500_bm_plat_data *plat_data = pdev->dev.platform_data;
I already told you about this.
your previous comment was: "No, it's meant to work w
Hi,
There is documentation at:
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0482h/ch13.html
Feel free to let me know if it's useful or not - I didn't write it, but I'm
always happy to pass feedback on.
And you could contact ARM support for help (via connect -
https://silver.a
Hello,
I submitted a patch for "flash-kernel" to Ubuntu to solve this problem:
> Kernel /boot/vmlinuz-3.4.0-1-linaro-lt-omap does not match your
> subarchitecture
> omap4, therefore not writing it to flash.
The problem has been reported as
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-ke
On 07/13/2012 03:43 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
We now have a fix for Gator to stop it deadlocking the system on 3.5
kernels [0].
This fix will find it's way into linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) when
Andrey next updates that with the ARM LT topics.
This Gator fix has been added into llct
14 matches
Mail list logo
