On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 12:45 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> Tixy: My attention on this issue has been somewhat limited. You've been
> by far the most involved in helping deploy config fragments (though, I
> don't want to be punishing good behavior by suggesting this, so feel
> free to say no! :),
Hi John,
On 06/07/2012 11:45 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On 06/06/2012 07:09 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
Are we going to start using the config fragments we created a while ago?
(Or did we not reach consensus on that?)
I wouldn't say there was a strong consensus. But I think we should push
to ma
Hi all,
It is our intention to take https://ci.linaro.org offline for about 15
minutes at 12:00 UTC
(http://www.worldtimeserver.com/current_time_in_UTC.aspx) in an effort
to fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-ci/+bug/959945 .
If the downtime will cause you significant problems, please get in
t
Use trace_find_event to find event name before looking through
/sys files. This helps 'perf report' to show real event names
instead of 'unknown:unknown' when processing perf.data recorded
on another machine.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov
---
tools/perf/builtin-report.c |4 +++-
1 files chan
Greetings,
There will be three linux-linaro trees this month. Also some LTs have
moved to 3.5, while the others will stay on older kernels.
In addition to linux-linaro-core-tracking and linux-linaro ones
(described under
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/LinuxLinaroKernelTreeProces
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 12:45 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On 06/06/2012 07:09 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > Are we going to start using the config fragments we created a while ago?
> > (Or did we not reach consensus on that?)
> I wouldn't say there was a strong consensus. But I think we should
On 06/08/2012 08:25 PM, the mail apparently from Andrey Konovalov included:
Greetings,
There will be three linux-linaro trees this month. Also some LTs have
moved to 3.5, while the others will stay on older kernels.
In addition to linux-linaro-core-tracking and linux-linaro ones
(described unde
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 12:45 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> On 06/06/2012 07:09 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>> > Are we going to start using the config fragments we created a while ago?
>> > (Or did we not reach consensus on that?)
>> I
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:15 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > Have a branch called config-core-tracking which will contain
> >
> > linaro-base.conf
> > ubuntu.conf
> > android.conf
> I think I missed something in an earlier thread. If I
Hi, Any clue or pointers to solve this issue?
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Bharathi Subramanian wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using Linaro 11.11 Gingerbread with 10" LCD and touchscreen. In
> that, the Android Virtual Keyboard is not visible fully on the screen.
> So unable to type Text in SMS or U
Hi Bharathi,
It is an issue with the soft keyboard. Can you install ICS keyboard apk .
It should work well on GB releases.
Regards,
Vishal
On 8 June 2012 20:38, Bharathi Subramanian wrote:
> Hi, Any clue or pointers to solve this issue?
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Bharathi Subramanian
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:15 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > Now, if the Ubuntu kernel packaging scripts could gain an option to
> > generate a config from these fragments... :-)
> >
> That will happen soon.
I should point out that at the
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:15 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>
>> > Now, if the Ubuntu kernel packaging scripts could gain an option to
>> > generate a config from these fragments...
Move this specific flag to the header file.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
drivers/idle/intel_idle.c |8
include/linux/cpuidle.h |7 +++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
index d0f59c3..3
We have the state index passed as parameter to the 'enter' function.
Most of the drivers assign their 'enter' functions several times in
the cpuidle_state structure, as we have the index, we can delegate
to the driver to handle their own callback array.
That will have the benefit of removing multi
We have a flag field for each cpuidle state but we don't use it
for the 'disabled' states. Let's remove the integer field and use
the flag field.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c|1 -
drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c |5 +++--
drivers/cpuidle/sysfs.c
The 'enter_dead' function is only used for processor_idle.c
and the same function is used several times. We fall into the
same abuse with the multiple callbacks for the same function.
This patch fixes that by moving the 'enter_dead' function to the
driver structure. A flag CPUIDLE_FLAG_DEAD_VALID
Hi Daniel,
On 06/08/2012 09:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> We have the state index passed as parameter to the 'enter' function.
> Most of the drivers assign their 'enter' functions several times in
> the cpuidle_state structure, as we have the index, we can delegate
> to the driver to handle thei
On 06/08/2012 07:33 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
Hi Deepthi,
> On 06/08/2012 09:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
>> We have the state index passed as parameter to the 'enter' function.
>> Most of the drivers assign their 'enter' functions several times in
>> the cpuidle_state structure,
19 matches
Mail list logo
