Hi.
I have gotten a lot of help from you guys getting the PowerVR drivers up
and running with the 3.3 kernel on the Pandaboard ES. Problem now is
that all I tested then, was that X was running. After some more work, we
tried out EGL, and found out that this is not working.
The 3.3 kernel I'm usin
Hi everyone,
I've been discussing multiplatform kernels with a few people recently,
and we will have a lot of discussion sessions about this at Linaro
Connect in Hong Kong.
One question that came up repeatedly is whether we should support all
possible board files for each platform in a multiplatf
On 05/03/2012 04:28 AM, Andy Green wrote:
On 04/25/2012 03:43 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
The plan is to rebase this tree on the
current mainline tip daily.
Now we're basing on it, our tracking progress depends on these "daily"
rebases, but it's stuck since Friday.
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:50:35PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been discussing multiplatform kernels with a few people recently,
> and we will have a lot of discussion sessions about this at Linaro
> Connect in Hong Kong.
>
> One question that came up repeatedly is whether
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Andrey Konovalov
wrote:
> On 05/03/2012 04:28 AM, Andy Green wrote:
>>
>> On 04/25/2012 03:43 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>>> The plan is to rebase this tree on the
>>> current mainline tip daily.
>>
>>
>> Now we're basing on it, ou
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:50:35PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> My feeling is that we should just mandate DT booting for multiplatform
> kernels, because it significantly reduces the combinatorial space
> at compile time, avoids a lot of legacy board files that we cannot
> test anyway, reduces the
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:50:35PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been discussing multiplatform kernels with a few people recently,
> and we will have a lot of discussion sessions about this at Linaro
> Connect in Hong Kong.
>
> One question that came up repeatedly is whether
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have gotten a lot of help from you guys getting the PowerVR drivers up
> and running with the 3.3 kernel on the Pandaboard ES. Problem now is
> that all I tested then, was that X was running. After some more work, we
> tried out EGL,
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:19:42AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I have gotten a lot of help from you guys getting the PowerVR drivers up
> > and running with the 3.3 kernel on the Pandaboard ES. Problem now is
> > that all I tested
On 05/03/2012 07:15 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Andrey Konovalov
wrote:
Sorry for the delay.
I've updated the linux-linaro-core-tracking, but it currently misses the
linaro-android-3.4 topic. Will put the linaro-android-3.4 topic back after
resolving the merge con
On 05/03/2012 08:10 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On 05/03/2012 07:15 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Andrey Konovalov
wrote:
Sorry for the delay.
I've updated the linux-linaro-core-tracking, but it currently misses the
linaro-android-3.4 topic. Will put the linaro-android-3
On 05/03/2012 09:16 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
On 05/03/2012 08:10 PM, John Stultz wrote:
So Andrey mailed me that there was a conflict between Linus' v3.4-rc5
and the Android tree, but when I went to updated the tree sort it out,
v.3.4-rc5 merged in without any issues. I suspect the collision
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:10 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 05/03/2012 07:15 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Andrey Konovalov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry for the delay.
>>>
>>> I've updated the linux-linaro-core-tracking, but it currently misses the
>>> linaro-android-3.4
On 05/03/2012 09:31 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:10 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On 05/03/2012 07:15 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Andrey Konovalov
wrote:
Sorry for the delay.
I've updated the linux-linaro-core-tracking, but it currently misses
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> With the previous changes all the states are valid, except
> the last state which can be handled by decreasing the number
> of states.
I don't think this changelog is valid anymore as you're not doing
anything to decrease the number of states.
I updated the changelog lo
On 05/03/12 17:34, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:19:42AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote:
Hi.
I have gotten a lot of help from you guys getting the PowerVR drivers up
and running with the 3.3 kernel on the Pandaboard ES.
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> and check the powerdomain lookup is successful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c |5 -
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
>
On 05/03/2012 10:19 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Daniel Lezcano writes:
With the previous changes all the states are valid, except
the last state which can be handled by decreasing the number
of states.
I don't think this changelog is valid anymore as you're not doing
anything to decrease the numb
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> Define a CPU_IDLE section in the makefile, declare the functions in
> the header files conforming to the kernel coding rules and remove the
> 'define's in the C files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet
This patch breaks compilation for the !CO
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> This patchset makes some cleanup on these cpuidle drivers
> and consolidate the code across both architecture.
I think I said it before, but it's worth repeating: Very nice cleanup!
Thanks for your persistence.
I've now been through this version and I think
On 05/03/2012 10:26 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Daniel Lezcano writes:
and check the powerdomain lookup is successful.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/a
On 05/03/2012 10:34 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Daniel Lezcano writes:
Define a CPU_IDLE section in the makefile, declare the functions in
the header files conforming to the kernel coding rules and remove the
'define's in the C files.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet
This p
Hi,
Trying to get back to the proper way of scheduling and publishing what
will be covered by the Developer Platform team during the 12.05 cycle,
follows the blueprint description of what we're planning to work on
during this cycle.
Milestone link: https://launchpad.net/linaro-dev-platform/+miles
On 3 May 2012 06:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been discussing multiplatform kernels with a few people recently,
> and we will have a lot of discussion sessions about this at Linaro
> Connect in Hong Kong.
>
> One question that came up repeatedly is whether we should support all
On 3 May 2012 07:04, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:50:35PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I've been discussing multiplatform kernels with a few people recently,
>> and we will have a lot of discussion sessions about this at Linaro
>> Connect in Hon
25 matches
Mail list logo
