Re: Screen going black with power saving disabled

2012-02-13 Thread E V
Nope :( Already tried most of the answers given. Problem is that is working... Most of the boots. But, as I said, sometimes it just goes black. Since I am not in front of the board (And it has no keyboard nor mouse, just connected to screen) can't do nothing with it... 2012/2/10 John Rigby > ma

Re: [pandaboard] Re: Screen going black with power saving disabled

2012-02-13 Thread E V
Will try and report. It is hard to say if something solves it, since it may fail after 10 or 20 boots, or 100... X is always run with the username 'linaro' or depends on the ubuntu user? 2012/2/13 nivr > The problem I had was screen blanking in X. Since X is run with the > username 'linaro', I p

Re: Screen going black with power saving disabled

2012-02-13 Thread nivr
The problem I had was screen blanking in X. Since X is run with the username 'linaro', I put the following lines in a startup script (/etc/rc.local) and it seems to do the trick: su linaro -c "xset -display :0 -dpms" su linaro -c "xset -display :0 s off" Does this help in any way? _

Re: i.MX6Q USB host support for mainline Linux (was: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] usb/ehci: Add USB support for the MX6Q)

2012-02-13 Thread Marek Vasut
> While discussing at the U-Boot mailing list about i.MX6Q USB host > support for U-Boot, there was the question what's about the same for > mainline Linux. See below. > > I'd like to continue this discussion with a new subject and adding the > Linaro mailing list. I'm not subscribed, this is go

Re: [pandaboard] Re: Screen going black with power saving disabled

2012-02-13 Thread nivr
It depends on the ubuntu user, but I'm running a linaro pre-made image for xbmc on the pandaboard so for me X is always run as 'linaro' user. You should check yours. I put those lines in rc.local so they are always executed on bootup. A better solution would probably be to put the corresponding

nano-summits over google+ hangouts

2012-02-13 Thread Tom Gall
Hi All, From what I've heard and saw it seemed like the google+ hangouts in the rooms worked fairly well. (For the very small sample size of the people I've talked to) I'm wondering/tempted to try out as an experiment on going single topic Multimedia sessions from time to time between Linaro Conn

Re: nano-summits over google+ hangouts

2012-02-13 Thread Kurt Taylor
On 13 February 2012 10:07, Tom Gall wrote: > Hi All, > > From what I've heard and saw it seemed like the google+ hangouts in > the rooms worked fairly well. (For the very small sample size of the > people I've talked to) > This was the 3rd remote LC for me and BY FAR the most useful and producti

Re: nano-summits over google+ hangouts

2012-02-13 Thread David Brown
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:07:17AM -0600, Tom Gall wrote: > From what I've heard and saw it seemed like the google+ hangouts in > the rooms worked fairly well. (For the very small sample size of the > people I've talked to) My experience wasn't so good. I think the issue may have been resolved,

Re: [PATCH][V2] ux500 : decouple/recouple gic from the PRCMU

2012-02-13 Thread Linus Walleij
(I took this discussion off linux-arm-kernel because I think the majority on that list doesn't really care about this stuff.) On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Rickard Andersson wrote: > it not clear how db8500-prcmu.c will be > handled in the future, db8500-prcmu.c should most likely be split int

Re: [PATCH][V3] ux500 : decouple/recouple gic from the PRCMU

2012-02-13 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > I think I addressed all the concerns, is it possible to merge this patch ? As detailed in another letter: does this build on top of the patch series "DB8500 PRCMU update" that was submitted some time ago? Please make sure it is either tha

Last call for patches for the 12.02 release of linux-linaro kernel

2012-02-13 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Greetings, If someone has something which is not in the mainline, was not in the 12.01 kernel release, but worth including into the 12.02 kernel release, please let me know by the end of Feb 14, PST (the git branch where I could pull from). This release will be v3.3-rc3 based, so you patches

Re: [PATCH][V3] ux500 : decouple/recouple gic from the PRCMU

2012-02-13 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 02/13/2012 08:43 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: I think I addressed all the concerns, is it possible to merge this patch ? As detailed in another letter: does this build on top of the patch series "DB8500 PRCMU update" that was submitted s

Re: [PATCH 0/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Clean up use/abuse of pdev->id

2012-02-13 Thread Rajendra Nayak
On Friday 10 February 2012 06:57 PM, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji wrote: On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:32 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> This series mainly cleans up all instances of hardcoding's in >> the driver based on pdev->id. This is clean