Re: [linux-pm] [RFC PATCH 2/2] thermal: Add generic cpu cooling implementation

2012-02-07 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Hello Amit, On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:43:16PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: > This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level > implementations using frequency scaling and cpuhotplugg currently. > Different cpu related cooling devices can be registered by the > user and the

Re: [PATCH] ux500 : decouple/recouple gic from the PRCMU

2012-02-07 Thread Rickard Andersson
On 02/06/2012 03:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 02/06/2012 10:19 AM, Rickard Andersson wrote: Hi! Our comments: Thanks Rickard and Jonas for your comments. - function names don't match commit comment disable/enable vs recouple/decouple. Decouple is a better name than disable, because GIC is

Re: [PATCH] ux500 : decouple/recouple gic from the PRCMU

2012-02-07 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 02/07/2012 09:39 AM, Rickard Andersson wrote: On 02/06/2012 03:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 02/06/2012 10:19 AM, Rickard Andersson wrote: Hi! Our comments: Thanks Rickard and Jonas for your comments. - function names don't match commit comment disable/enable vs recouple/decouple. Deco

Re: [PATCH] ux500 : decouple/recouple gic from the PRCMU

2012-02-07 Thread Rickard Andersson
On 02/07/2012 10:22 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 02/07/2012 09:39 AM, Rickard Andersson wrote: On 02/06/2012 03:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 02/06/2012 10:19 AM, Rickard Andersson wrote: Hi! Our comments: Thanks Rickard and Jonas for your comments. - function names don't match commit co

Re: [PATCH 0/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Clean up use/abuse of pdev->id

2012-02-07 Thread S, Venkatraman
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > This series mainly cleans up all instances of hardcoding's in > the driver based on pdev->id. This is cleanup leading to the > DT adaptation of omap_hsmmc driver. > > Patches are based on 3.3-rc2 and can be found here > git://gitorious.org/om

Re: FW: [PATCH 02/07] HWMON: DA9052/53 hwmon driver v1

2012-02-07 Thread Ashish Jangam
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 17:52 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote: > Can you consider adding yourself or David as maintainer ? Not a must, > but no one else would really be able to support the driver. Thank for this, you can add my name. > > +Supported chips: > > + * Dialog Semiconductors DA9052-BC and DA90

Re: [PATCH] ux500 : decouple/recouple gic from the PRCMU

2012-02-07 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 02/07/2012 10:57 AM, Rickard Andersson wrote: On 02/07/2012 10:22 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 02/07/2012 09:39 AM, Rickard Andersson wrote: On 02/06/2012 03:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 02/06/2012 10:19 AM, Rickard Andersson wrote: Hi! Our comments: Thanks Rickard and Jonas for your

Re: [PATCH] sched: move CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING to common code

2012-02-07 Thread Yong Zhang
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:19:49AM +0400, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > Since CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is architecture-agnostic, > move it from x86 area to common code. IIRC, it's x86 dependent now. Thanks, Yong > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov > --- > arch/x86/Kconfig | 11 --- > lib

Re: [PATCH] sched: move CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING to common code

2012-02-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Dmitry Antipov wrote: > Since CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is architecture-agnostic, > move it from x86 area to common code. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov > --- > arch/x86/Kconfig | 11 --- > lib/Kconfig.debug | 11 +++ > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletio

Re: FW: [PATCH 02/07] HWMON: DA9052/53 hwmon driver v1

2012-02-07 Thread Guenter Roeck
Hi Ashish, On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:07:10AM -0500, Ashish Jangam wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 17:52 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote: > > Can you consider adding yourself or David as maintainer ? Not a must, > > but no one else would really be able to support the driver. > Thank for this, you can ad

Re: [PATCH] ux500 : decouple/recouple gic from the PRCMU

2012-02-07 Thread Vincent Guittot
On 7 February 2012 15:15, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 02/07/2012 10:57 AM, Rickard Andersson wrote: >> >> On 02/07/2012 10:22 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> >>> On 02/07/2012 09:39 AM, Rickard Andersson wrote: On 02/06/2012 03:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 02/06/2012 10:19 AM

Re: [PATCH 0/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Clean up use/abuse of pdev->id

2012-02-07 Thread Rajendra Nayak
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 02:02 AM, S, Venkatraman wrote: I gave it a spin on Beagleboard-XM (OMAP3630) with root filesystem on the SD card, and checked again on 4430SDP. Tested-by: Venkatraman S Great, thanks Venkat. ___ linaro-dev mailing list l

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC PATCH] thermal: Add support to report cooling statistics achieved by cooling devices

2012-02-07 Thread Amit Kachhap
Hi eduardo, Thanks for the detail review. On 6 February 2012 23:09, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Hello Amit, > > some comments embedded. > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: >> Add a sysfs node code to report effective cooling of all cooling devices >> attached t

[PATCH] sched: generalize CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING for X86 and ARM

2012-02-07 Thread Dmitry Antipov
Generalize CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING between X86 and ARM, move "noirqtime=" option to common debugging code. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov --- arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c |3 +++ arch/x86/Kconfig | 11 --- arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c |4 include/linux/sc

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC PATCH 2/2] thermal: Add generic cpu cooling implementation

2012-02-07 Thread Amit Kachhap
Hi eduardo, Again thanks for the review. On 7 February 2012 00:25, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Hello Amit, > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:43:16PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: >> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level >> implementations using frequency scaling and cp

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC PATCH] thermal: Add support to report cooling statistics achieved by cooling devices

2012-02-07 Thread Amit Kachhap
On 6 February 2012 16:18, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:16:17PM -0800, Amit Kachhap wrote: >> On 6 February 2012 09:03, Greg KH wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:56:58PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> >> >> > Add a sysfs node code to report effective cooling of all

Re: [PATCH 6/6] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Don't expect MMC1 to always have vmmc supply

2012-02-07 Thread S, Venkatraman
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > MMC1 is not the only instance that can be used/wired for SD. > So remove this assumption from the driver. > > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak > --- >  drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c |   14 -- >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC PATCH] thermal: Add support to report cooling statistics achieved by cooling devices

2012-02-07 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Hello Amit, On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:52:40AM -0800, Amit Kachhap wrote: > Hi eduardo, > > Thanks for the detail review. > > On 6 February 2012 23:09, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > > Hello Amit, > > > > some comments embedded. > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap w

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC PATCH 2/2] thermal: Add generic cpu cooling implementation

2012-02-07 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Hello Amit, On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:21:15AM -0800, Amit Kachhap wrote: > Hi eduardo, > > Again thanks for the review. > > On 7 February 2012 00:25, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > > Hello Amit, > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:43:16PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: > >> This patch adds suppor

[REMINDER] Linaro 12.02 release dates and deliveries

2012-02-07 Thread David Zinman
Greetings, Hope everyone is enjoying connect so far. This is a reminder for the coming release dates: * Linaro 12.02 Toolchain WG release February 9, 2012. * Linaro 12.02 Platform/WGs/LTs is February 16, 2012. * Linaro 12.02 Release Candidate is February 20, 2012. * Linaro 12.02 Release image

Re: [PATCH] sched: generalize CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING for X86 and ARM

2012-02-07 Thread Venki Pallipadi
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > Generalize CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING  between X86 and > ARM, move "noirqtime=" option to common debugging code. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov > --- >  arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c |    3 +++ >  arch/x86/Kconfig              |   11 ---

Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

2012-02-07 Thread Andrew Richardson
Greetings, I'm experiencing what appears to be a minimum clock resolution issue in using clock_gettime() on a PandaBoard ES running ubuntu. *> uname -r* 3.1.1-8-linaro-lt-omap *> cat /proc/version* Linux version 3.1.1-8-linaro-lt-omap (buildd@diphda) (gcc version 4.6.1 (Ubuntu/

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

2012-02-07 Thread Zygmunt Krynicki
On 02/07/2012 11:43 PM, Andrew Richardson wrote: Greetings, I'm experiencing what appears to be a minimum clock resolution issue in using clock_gettime() on a PandaBoard ES running ubuntu. *> uname -r* 3.1.1-8-linaro-lt-omap *> cat /proc/version* Linux version 3.1.1-8-linaro-lt

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

2012-02-07 Thread Andrew Richardson
I was using CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW before. I just tried CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_REALTIME and did not see any improvement when timing 2-3ms events. Andrew On 12-02-07 06:16 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: On 02/07/2012 11:43 PM, Andrew Richardson wrote: Greetings, I'm experiencing what appears t

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

2012-02-07 Thread John Stultz
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 00:16 +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > On 02/07/2012 11:43 PM, Andrew Richardson wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I'm experiencing what appears to be a minimum clock resolution issue in > > using clock_gettime() on a PandaBoard ES running ubuntu. > > > > *> uname -r* > >

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

2012-02-07 Thread John Stultz
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 20:21 -0500, Andrew Richardson wrote: > On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Stultz wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 00:16 +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > > Hrm. No, that shouldn't be the case. CLOCK_MONOTONIC and > > CLOCK_REALTIME > > are driven by the same accumulation, and ar

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

2012-02-07 Thread Dmitry Antipov
On 02/07/2012 02:43 PM, Andrew Richardson wrote: I'm experiencing what appears to be a minimum clock resolution issue in using clock_gettime() on a PandaBoard ES running ubuntu. Do you have CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER enabled in your kernel? Look at 'dmesg | grep clock' and check for the following:

PPP synch and async

2012-02-07 Thread Etienne Le Sueur
Hi Linaro-dev list, I'm trying to set up my Pandaboard as a small server using a 3G USB dongle. I'm trying to set up a PPP connection to my provider, but pppd is complaining: "Couldn't set tty to PPP discipline: Invalid argument" My google-foo tells me that this could be the result of some dis

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

2012-02-07 Thread Andrew Richardson
On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Stultz wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 00:16 +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: >> On 02/07/2012 11:43 PM, Andrew Richardson wrote: >> >> Which clock_t were you using? I think CLOCK_MONOTONIC makes sense for >> what you are trying to do and perhaps it has different res