Linaro Android build(s)

2012-01-29 Thread hedwin
Gents, For some time now I am trying to build android from the linaro repos. Sofar I never succedded, it always resulted in build failures or it doesn't boot. So what did it do: I tried the 11.12 release staging and tracking. Got the last to build after switching to the 4.6 toolchain (nowhere do

Re: Linaro Android build(s)

2012-01-29 Thread Tony Mansson
Hi Hedwin. Have you followed the instructions here? https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android Get the Source Code and Build the Source Code should tell you what you need. The exact details

Re: Linaro Android build(s)

2012-01-29 Thread hedwin
Tony, thnx for your reply. Yes followed both instructions, the wiki and the build service. It is not that I am unfamiliar on how to build android, been doing this since 2009 when I put android on a TV, this was mips based I now use omap3530, omap3730 base boards and pandaboard. The thing is I onl

Re: Screen going black with power saving disabled

2012-01-29 Thread nivr
Would you mind explaining how you disabled the power saving? Regards ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

2012-01 Samsung kernel trees

2012-01-29 Thread Vic Berdin
Hi everyone, Any chance the linux-linaro-*-lt-samsung kernel trees will get updated (soon)? By the way, is there a daily/nightly build source for these trees? I am eager to try them out. TIA - Vic ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro

Re: 2012-01 Samsung kernel trees

2012-01-29 Thread Tushar Behera
Hi Vic, CC: sams...@lists.linaro.org On 01/30/2012 08:54 AM, Vic Berdin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > Any chance the linux-linaro-*-lt-samsung kernel trees will get updated Samsung LT maintains following tree [1], you may have a look at it. Is that what you are looking for? > (soon)? By the wa

Re: [PATCH] module: avoid call vmalloc if init size is zero

2012-01-29 Thread Dmitry Antipov
On 01/27/2012 03:21 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: Please fix __vmalloc_node_range() instead to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR. And of course, vfree() to use ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(). For the convenience and uniformity, should {alloc,free}_percpu() be also modified in that way? Dmitry