Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] clk: introduce the common clock framework

On 01/12/2012 04:48 PM, Rob Herring wrote: On 01/12/2012 06:04 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: On 01/04/2012 08:07 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Rob Herring wrote: On 01/04/2012 07:01 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Rob Herring wrote: On 01/

Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] clk: introduce the common clock framework

On 01/04/2012 08:07 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Rob Herring wrote: On 01/04/2012 07:01 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Rob Herring wrote: On 01/03/2012 08:15 PM, Richard Zhao wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:45:48PM -0800, Turquette

Re: l-m-c hacking for UEFI

On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 17:35 -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > I wonder if it wouldn't be better to make hwpacks include just one > bootloader (whichever is chosen by the hwpack author)? This could make the transition difficult. Some users (like LAVA) require U-Boot, whereas others might want to us

Re: l-m-c hacking for UEFI

On 01/13/2012 10:38 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 17:35 -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote: I wonder if it wouldn't be better to make hwpacks include just one bootloader (whichever is chosen by the hwpack author)? This could make the transition difficult. Some users (like LA

using cpuidle on panda board

Hi, I'd like to do some tests with cpuidle on my panda board but i'm facing some issues: Originally, i'd like to use the Linaro developer image which uses the landing team branch tilt-linux-linaro-3.1 but the omap4 cpuidle driver only works when cpu1 is off whereas i'd like to do some test with b

Re: l-m-c hacking for UEFI

Hi Ryan, Guilherme, all, У чет, 12. 01 2012. у 17:35 -0300, Guilherme Salgado пише: > > I'm wondering... do you have any use cases for the none and all > options? At least the 'all' option should make sense: I remember reading that UEFI can happily live alongside a different boot loader as well,

Re: using cpuidle on panda board

On 01/13/2012 05:59 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Hi, I'd like to do some tests with cpuidle on my panda board but i'm facing some issues: Originally, i'd like to use the Linaro developer image which uses the landing team branch tilt-linux-linaro-3.1 but the omap4 cpuidle drive

Re: using cpuidle on panda board

On 13 January 2012 16:13, Andy Green wrote: > On 01/13/2012 05:59 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to do some tests with cpuidle on my panda board but i'm >> facing some issues: >> >> Originally, i'd like to use the Linaro developer image which uses the >> la

Re: using cpuidle on panda board

On 13 January 2012 12:12, Jassi Brar wrote: > On 13 January 2012 16:13, Andy Green wrote: >> On 01/13/2012 05:59 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to do some tests with cpuidle on my panda board but i'm >>> facing some issues: >>> >>> Originally, i'd like

[PATCH] ARM: pl330: fix null pointer dereference in pl330_chan_ctrl()

This fixes the thrd->req_running field being accessed before thrd is checked for null. The error was introduced in abb959f. Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard --- arch/arm/common/pl330.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/common/pl330.c b/arch/arm/comm

Re: [PATCH] ARM: pl330: fix null pointer dereference in pl330_chan_ctrl()

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:36:31PM +, Mans Rullgard wrote: > This fixes the thrd->req_running field being accessed before thrd > is checked for null. The error was introduced in abb959f. > > Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard I don't know what's happening with the PL330 driver, but there's patche

Finding source code for Linaro kernels

For everyone who packages kernel trees: I've had some questions about getting the source for linaro kernel packaged, and it seems that this is still not straightforward: Getting the debian package source (i.e., flat tarball) for a binary kernel is possible, but only if it is a non-superseded ver

Re: l-m-c hacking for UEFI

On 13 January 2012 10:09, Danilo Šegan wrote: > Hi Ryan, Guilherme, all, > > У чет, 12. 01 2012. у 17:35 -0300, Guilherme Salgado пише: >> >> I'm wondering... do you have any use cases for the none and all >> options? I don't have a use case for none, but it was easy to add and I considered it

Re: [PATCH] ARM: pl330: fix null pointer dereference in pl330_chan_ctrl()

On 13/01/12 12:36, Mans Rullgard wrote: > This fixes the thrd->req_running field being accessed before thrd > is checked for null. The error was introduced in abb959f. > > Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard > --- > arch/arm/common/pl330.c |3 ++- As Russell points out, the s5p tree has merged thi

Re: [PATCH] mmc: use usleep_range() in mmc_delay()

On 01/13/2012 05:22 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote: Anyway, I think the change is good. On systems with multiple MMC devices the boot/probe can spend 100-200 ms alone just doing busylooping delays. I think e.g. in mmc_rescan() the code uses frequently mmc_delay(10). I'm worrying about this: mmc_dela

Re: linaro powertop doesn't work during initialization of ncurse

Hi, FYI: We just merged powertop into our Android 4.0.3. builds again, it was lost when we went from Gingerbread before Christmas. I tested it on Snowball and it ran well. There are some funny numbers that need to be investigated but I saw no problems related to ncurses. http://android.git.linar

Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] clk: introduce the common clock framework

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 04:04:23PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote: > While the original clk_hw suggestion was well intentioned, it just > forces too many unnecessary dereferences and indirection. It also > prevents static init of some fields as others have mentioned. > Overall, it made the MSM clock

Re: [PATCH] mmc: use usleep_range() in mmc_delay()

Hi, On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Dmitry Antipov wrote: From f447d78db65c6675e69466e8ed08364ff065ac08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry Antipov Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:51:03 +0400 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: use usleep_range() in mmc_delay() --- Shouldn't you add a proper patch description and a sign

Re: [PATCH] mmc: use usleep_range() in mmc_delay()

Hi, On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Dmitry Antipov wrote: On 01/13/2012 05:22 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote: Anyway, I think the change is good. On systems with multiple MMC devices the boot/probe can spend 100-200 ms alone just doing busylooping delays. I think e.g. in mmc_rescan() the code uses frequently mm

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Dave Martin wrote: > For everyone who packages kernel trees: > > > I've had some questions about getting the source for linaro kernel > packaged, and it seems that this is still not straightforward: > ... This seems reasonable to me. This month we are adding CI a

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John Rigby wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Dave Martin wrote: >> For everyone who packages kernel trees: >> >> >> I've had some questions about getting the source for linaro kernel >> packaged, and it seems that this is still not straightforward: >> > ..

Re: using cpuidle on panda board

On 01/13/2012 08:34 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: (adding AmitK) Amit, do you know of a good place to raid for better cpuidle, closer to upstream than OZ? -Andy On 13 January 2012 12:12, Jassi Brar wrote: On 13 January 2012 16:13, Andy Green wrote: On 01/13/2012 05:59 P

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

The CI autopackaged TI 3.1 kernels all land here: https://github.com/jcrigby/packaged-linux-linaro-3.1-ci/commits/lt-omap/ All 3.1 LT and non LT kernel land there in different branches but each branch gets overwritten with each new merge so you need the tag to find a particular release. On Fri, J

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

Linaro Android kernels are very easy to find Browse to: https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/staging-origen/#build=142 Click on Downloads You'll see: http://snapshots.linaro.org/android/~linaro-android/staging-origen/142/source-manifest.xml and http://snapshots.linaro.org/

Re: using cpuidle on panda board

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andy Green wrote: > Amit, do you know of a good place to raid for better cpuidle, closer to > upstream than OZ? wasn't that merged in 3.2? are you looking for that : http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=9827266

Re: [PATCH V6 4/7] cpufreq: add clk-reg cpufreq driver

On 1/12/2012 11:52 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Richard Zhao writes: [...] Do you have real case to need different voltage/clk? Sure, any system with independently scalable CPUs/clusters. AFAIK, in the ARM SoC world there is a least the MSM8660 that does support that today. Regards, Benoit

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

I was specifically after solving the problem for the debianised kernels. Android is an analogous but completely separate problem -- if you already have a solution there then great. > https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/staging-origen/#build=142 I assume people can tell from t

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

On 13 January 2012 11:36, Dave Martin wrote: > I was specifically after solving the problem for the debianised > kernels.  Android is an analogous but completely separate problem -- > if you already have a solution there then great. > >> https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/stag

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On 13 January 2012 11:36, Dave Martin wrote: >> I was specifically after solving the problem for the debianised >> kernels.  Android is an analogous but completely separate problem -- >> if you already have a solution there then great. >> >>>

Re: using cpuidle on panda board

On 13 January 2012 22:44, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andy Green wrote: >> >> Amit, do you know of a good place to raid for better cpuidle, closer to >> upstream than OZ? > > wasn't that merged in 3.2? are you looking for that : > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux

[Activity] Kernel WG Weekly Status report for week ending 2012-01-13

Enclosed please find the link to the Weekly Status & Individual Activity reports for the kernel working group for the week ending 2012-01-13 == Weekly Status Report == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Status/2012-01-12

[PATCH] ARM: pl330: fix null pointer dereference in pl330_chan_ctrl()

This fixes the thrd->req_running field being accessed before thrd is checked for null. The error was introduced in abb959f. Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard --- drivers/dma/pl330.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c i

[Activity] Power Management WG Weekly Status report for week ending 2012-01-13

Enclosed please find the link to the Weekly Status report & meeting minutes for the Power Management working group for the week ending 2012-01-13 == Weekly Status Report == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Status/2012-01-12 == Meeting Minutes == https://wiki.linaro.org/Wor

Re: using cpuidle on panda board

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andy Green wrote: >> >> Amit, do you know of a good place to raid for better cpuidle, closer to >> upstream than OZ? > > > wasn't that merged in 3.2? are you looking for that : > http://git.kernel.org

Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] clk: introduce the common clock framework

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On 12/17/2011 03:04 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:45:48PM -0800, Turquette, Mike wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Thomas Gleixner >>>  wrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Mike Turquett

Re: using cpuidle on panda board

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andy Green wrote: >>> >>> Amit, do you know of a good place to raid for better cpuidle, closer to >>> upstream than OZ? >> >> >> wasn't that

Re: using cpuidle on panda board

On 01/14/2012 12:52 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andy Green wrote: Amit, do you know of a good place to raid for better cpuid