(2011年07月06日 18:36), ashishj3 wrote:
> +static int __devinit da9052_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct da9052_regulator *regulator;
> + struct da9052 *da9052;
> + struct da9052_pdata *pdata;
> + int ret;
> +
> + regulator = kzalloc(sizeof(struct da9052
> -Original Message-
> From: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) [mailto:paul@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 2:54 PM
> To: Ashish Jangam
> Cc: Mark Brown; Dajun; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; l...@slimlogic.co.uk
> Subject: Re: [Patch 5/11] Regulator: D
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there
> any reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
> vs.
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/
>
> Would
On 7 October 2011 13:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
>>
>> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there
>> any reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
>> v
FYI, for people in Cambridge, UK next week
Reply to Jonathan Cameron (below) if you are interested in attending.
For up-to-date guidelines on creating keys, try this:
http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning
Cheers
---Dave
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ralf Baechle
Date: Thu, Oc
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 13:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Paul Larson
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there
> >> any reason for the lack of consistency between d
The structure *_irq_driver is passed as a parameter in
sysdev_driver_register(). This in turn would add this structure to a
list which may be traversed later.
Hence, even though the functions referenced through this structure have
__init attribute, we cannot possibly add __initdata attribute to it
usb_simtec_init() references s3c_ohci_set_platdata() which is defined
with __init attribute. Hence to remove section mismatch warning, __init
attribute is added to usb_simtec_init().
It removes following two warnigs.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1460c): Section mismatch in reference from
the functi
While compiling with s3c2410_defconfig, we receive 4 section mismatch
warnings.
Patch 1 addresses a couple of warnings related to usb_simtec_init().
Patch 2 addresses mismatch warnings in a couple of mach-*/irq.c files.
Changes for V2:
* The original patch is splitted to address to differ
On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu
Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it
has nano, alip, hwpacks and all the rest. I think calling it
"ubuntu-build" would be rather confusing...
> 1. mo
On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu
>
> Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it
> has nano, alip, hwpacks and all the rest. I think calling i
The Dialog PMIC has below featured regulators:-
DA9052-BC - 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 3.6V upto 1Amp.
DA9053-AA/BX - 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 2.5V upto 3Amp.
DA9052/53 - 10 Programmable LDO's High PSSR, 1% accuracy.
This patch support all the DA9052 and Da9053 regulators. The output voltage
The Dialog PMIC has below featured regulators:-
DA9052-BC - 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 3.6V upto 1Amp.
DA9053-AA/BX - 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 2.5V upto 3Amp.
DA9052/53 - 10 Programmable LDO's High PSSR, 1% accuracy.
This patch support all the DA9052 and Da9053 regulators. The output voltage
On 7 October 2011 13:16, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
>>> Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu
>>
>> Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it
>> has na
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:29:47 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there any
> reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
> vs.
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/
>
> Woul
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:23:12 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> 2. use directory structure matching the project group names used on
> offspring.linaro.org; e.g. natty-hwpacks, natty-images, oneiric-hwpacks,
> oneiric-Images, etc.
This would be a useful step in removing the need to request syncs from
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:27:38 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> on the same front I see we still redirect ubuntu-build to offspring ... can
> we flip that
> around? e.g. make offspring.l.o redirect to ubuntu-build?
Yes, just file an RT to request the change.
Thanks,
James
__
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:37:29PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 13:16, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> > On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
> >>> Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu
> >>
> >>
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:29 AM, James Westby wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:29:47 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
>> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there any
>> reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:38:35AM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:45:00PM -0500, Kurt Taylor wrote:
>
> > > There are only 3 left from the list that are bounded enough to consider:
> > > 1) Compress
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:37:29PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 7 October 2011 13:16, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>> > On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> >>> Also, it
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:46:57AM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> >> >> Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it
> >> >> has nano, alip, hwpacks and all the rest. I think calling it
> >> >> "ubuntu-build" would be rather confusing...
> >> >
> >> > These images are all Ubuntu based
Hi all,
For kernel guys and landing teams, I've posted some kernel-specific
info on mirating to Thumb-2 here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Thumb2Guide
If your kernel tree isn't building in Thumb-2 yet, please do take a look.
Let me know if you want more information on anything, o
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:37:15 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> Thanks for the update James. Say related we have the following hwpack
> directory names:
>
> efikamx-oneiric
> igep-oneiric
> imx51-oneiric
> omap3-oneiric
> omap3-x11-base-oneiric
> overo-oneiric
> pa
Enclosed please find the link to the Weekly Status report
for the Power Management working group for the week ending 2011-10-07
== Meeting Minutes ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2011-10-05
== Weekly Status Report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerM
Hi all, does anyone know why all the hwpack builds have started failing?
See, for example:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/panda/20111006/0/build-log.txt
...a similar problem seems to have affected the recent builds for every hwpack.
Looks like some build-depends package
http://lwn.net/Articles/462076/
How many of these are relevant to ARM platforms (including Android), and
what would feature on an ARM Plumber's Wish List?
--
Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP
Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935
Linaro.org: Open Source Software for AR
Yes and it has been fixed.
On 7 October 2011 19:40, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi all, does anyone know why all the hwpack builds have started failing?
>
> See, for example:
>
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/panda/20111006/0/build-log.txt
>
> ...a similar problem seems to have
On Friday 07 October 2011, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/462076/
>
> How many of these are relevant to ARM platforms (including Android), and
> what would feature on an ARM Plumber's Wish List?
They all apply to ARM but I see these more as small annoyances not to
Enclosed please find the link to the Weekly Status report
for the kernel working group for the week ending 2011-10-07
== Meeting Minutes ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Meetings/2011-10-03
== Weekly Status Report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Status/2011-10-06
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, James Westby wrote:
> Note that Paul requests keeping the suffixes, but I guess that's
> predicated on renaming the top level.
>
The main reason I like having a suffix of some kind is so that it's obvious
which series it's from by the filename. If someone includes
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:09:23 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, James Westby
> wrote:
>
> > Note that Paul requests keeping the suffixes, but I guess that's
> > predicated on renaming the top level.
> >
> The main reason I like having a suffix of some kind is so that it'
(crashing as it was installing the build tool.)
That was fixed yesterday, but no-one triggered rebuilds, so they all
were fixed with the rebuild that started an hour or so ago.
There is now just one failure:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/build/lt-s5pv310-natty/20111007/0/build-log.txt
which is a
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 12:43:02PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Note that there's already an API from Intel which people are relatively
> > happy with, it mostly just needs some fettling for kernel integration -
> > after t
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:20:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 12:43:02PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Note that there's already an API from Intel which people are relatively
> > > happy with, i
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:17 PM, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:09:23 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, James Westby
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Note that Paul requests keeping the suffixes, but I guess that's
>> > predicated on renaming the top level.
>> >
>> The m
so ago.
>
> There is now just one failure:
>
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/build/lt-s5pv310-natty/20111007/0/build-log.txt
>
> which is a problem with the config or the packages, as it's asking for a
> package that doesn't exist, so this is not a systemic problem, but
37 matches
Mail list logo
