On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On 27 September 2011 06:23, Ricardo Salveti
> wrote:
>> Any specific reason why using the build from 0926 as the RC instead of
>> 0927?
>
> According to the schedule, RC images are delivered 3 days before the release,
> Monda
On 27 September 2011 09:59, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>> Hi Ricardo,
>>
>> On 27 September 2011 06:23, Ricardo Salveti
>> wrote:
>>> Any specific reason why using the build from 0926 as the RC instead of
>>> 0927?
>>
>> According to the schedu
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Linus Walleij wrote at Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:17 AM:
>>
>> Great, I'm hunting your Acked-by/Reviewed-by ...
>
> Very close; I was just holding off until we resolved the discussion on
> hog'd non-system mapping table entries, and I f
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Linus Walleij wrote at Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:17 AM:
>> To abstract things the stuff we can do with the group should be
>> something enumerated too. So:
>>
>> pinctrl_config_group(const char *pinctrl_device, const char *group,
>> co
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Linus Walleij wrote at Wednesday, September 21, 2011 2:25 AM:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> > Linus Walleij wrote at Friday, September 16, 2011 6:14 AM:
>> >> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(u300_mux_hogs);
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 27 September 2011 09:59, Ricardo Salveti
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Fathi Boudra
> wrote:
> >> Hi Ricardo,
> >>
> >> On 27 September 2011 06:23, Ricardo Salveti
> wrote:
> >>> Any specific reason why using the build fr
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:27 AM, David Long wrote:
> Andy made an interesting suggestion to me. What if the profile event code
> allocated all the counters to the requested event. It could reallocate half
> of them if a second event was also requested, and so on, till we're down to
> one (unreli
Hello,
I am trying to build the upstream kernel like linux-linaro-3.0,
linux(linus), linux-next, linux-arm-soc for next builds with omap2plus
defconfig,
Create a kernel debian package and use this debian package to verify the
build. The builds are enabled with ext3 file system.
The scripts that i
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 16:29 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> Please just do something :) I don't see why you can't supply the
> kernels with oprofile working in timer mode with a usable sampling
> frequency *right now*. That should be enough for the helpless users
> who can't or don't want to tw
On Monday 26 September 2011, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 02:28:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > ext4 has optimizations for flash media in it and btrfs is better by
> > design.
>
> Do you have a pointer to more info about what kind of optimizations for
> flash media ext4 ha
Hi All,
As part of the 11.09 cycle I've completed an extension to live-build3
that add linaro-media-create. This means with this branch of linaro's
live-build 3 one is able to build your custom image and directly
output it to either your SD media or to a file which you an dd
directly to the media
> +static int pin_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> + int pin, const char *function, bool gpio,
> + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *gpio_range)
> +{
> + struct pin_desc *desc;
> + const struct pinmux_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->pmxops;
> + i
Enclosed please find a link to the Weekly Status report from the
Infrastructure team for 2011-09-20 to 2011-09-26 period.
== Meeting Minutes ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Meetings/2011-09-27
== Weekly Status Report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Status/201
Hi all,
Over recent months I've had a steady stream of comments from
external people trying to use the Linaro deliverables about the
difficulty of getting started, understanding what Linaro produces
and how to use it.
My experience with supporting users is that using and making sense
of the lina
I think this would be worthwhile session.
Coming from Gentoo, one thing we always put time into was our
documentation. It was/is generally goal based and smoke tested. As an
example, it's a worthwhile exercise to bring someone into the picture
who is completely unfamiliar with your area. Give them
On 27 September 2011 20:42, Tom Gall wrote:
> It's too bad our wiki pages don't have a feedback mechanism to allow
> people to comment on the quality of the information there, and post
> problems/issues/questions left unanswered that they need.
You can fill bugs on linaro-documentation:
https://l
On 09/27/2011 01:19 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 27 September 2011 20:42, Tom Gall wrote:
>> It's too bad our wiki pages don't have a feedback mechanism to allow
>> people to comment on the quality of the information there, and post
>> problems/issues/questions left unanswered that they need.
>
>
On 09/27/2011 11:57 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Over recent months I've had a steady stream of comments from
> external people trying to use the Linaro deliverables about the
> difficulty of getting started, understanding what Linaro produces
> and how to use it.
>
>
> My experience wit
Status: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/WeeklyReport
Last meeting minutes:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2011-09-21
== Highlights ==
- For the release : the only item which should be highlighted, was
the glproxy not making a release afte
Linus Walleij wrote at Tuesday, September 27, 2011 1:51 AM:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Linus Walleij wrote at Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:17 AM:
> >> To abstract things the stuff we can do with the group should be
> >> something enumerated too. So:
> >>
> >> p
Linus Walleij wrote at Tuesday, September 27, 2011 2:01 AM:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Linus Walleij wrote at Wednesday, September 21, 2011 2:25 AM:
> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Stephen Warren
> >> wrote:
> >> > Linus Walleij wrote at Friday, September
Just out of curiosity, have you tried building an image locally using this
hwpack and booting it?
Thanks,
Paul Larson
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Deepti Kalakeri wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build the upstream kernel like linux-linaro-3.0,
> linux(linus), linux-next, linux-arm-soc
Hello Paul,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, have you tried building an image locally using this
> hwpack and booting it?
>
>
I have not tried this specifically, but I have tried other hwpacks coming
out of the same job.
> Thanks,
> Paul Larson
>
>
Th
23 matches
Mail list logo
