On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:32:25PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> A quick poll of the ARM platforms that implement CPU Hotplug support
> shows that every platform treats CPU 0 as a special case that cannot be
> hotplugged. In fact every platform has identical code for
> platform_cpu_die which retu
Tushar Behera wrote:
>
> From: JeongHyeon Kim
>
> Insignal's ORIGEN board is based Samsung EXYNOS4210 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: JeongHyeon Kim
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera
> ---
>
> Changes for V2:
> - Reworked based on Kukjin's comments and rebased to kgene/for-next
>
> arch/arm/mach-exy
Lorenzo, Colin,
On 7/7/2011 9:20 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
From: Colin Cross
When the cpu is powered down in a low power mode, the gic cpu
interface may be reset, and when the cpu complex is powered
down, the gic distributor may also be reset.
This patch uses CPU_PM_ENTER and CPU_PM_EXIT no
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:32:12AM +0100, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Lorenzo, Colin,
>
> On 7/7/2011 9:20 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > From: Colin Cross
> >
> > When the cpu is powered down in a low power mode, the gic cpu
> > interface may be reset, and when the cpu complex is powered
> > dow
On 7/21/2011 3:57 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:32:12AM +0100, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Lorenzo, Colin,
On 7/7/2011 9:20 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
From: Colin Cross
When the cpu is powered down in a low power mode, the gic cpu
interface may be reset, and when the
Hello,
Well, before proceeding further, there seems that tarball naming
convention has changed. For example, now it's
gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.07.tar.bz2 whereas before it was
gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.06-0.tar.bz2 . What's worse is that inside it's
still gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.07-0 top-level directory. The bui
Hello,
Well, before proceeding further, there seems that tarball naming
convention has changed. For example, now it's
gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.07.tar.bz2 whereas before it was
gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.06-0.tar.bz2 . What's worse is that inside it's
still gcc-linaro-4.6-2011.07-0 top-level directory. The bui
The PM-QA changed its license to GPLv2
https://wiki.linaro.org/TSC
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
COPYING | 339 +
Makefile | 37 ++-
testcases.awk |
On 11 Jul 21, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The PM-QA changed its license to GPLv2
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/TSC
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
Ack
> ---
> COPYING | 339
> +
> Makefile |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/21/2011 01:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The PM-QA changed its license to GPLv2
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/TSC
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
Applied with Amit's ack.
Thanks
-- Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:03:04AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Just talking on behalf of OMAP, we can't offline CPU0 and limitation
> would remain in future OMAPs too.
Apart from the broken IRQ migration, and the way CPU0 immediately
reawakes if it is offlined on OMAP4 (even when IRQs are mi
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the
Linaro Developer Platforms Weekly Status meeting held on July 14th
in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 14:00 UTC.
http://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/Meetings/2011-07-14
Carried over Actions:
rsalveti to ping asa
Hi All,
As John Rigby expressed interest in having a short hands-on session on
DS-5 (covering interesting aspects like debugging in command line ;-)
during Linaro Connect in Cambourne, I was just wondering if there would
be anyone else keen on joining us? If so, let me know so I can prepare
enough
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:07:00PM +0530, ashishj3 wrote:
> The DA9052 is a highly integrated PMIC subsystem with supply domain
> flexibility
> to support wide range of high performance application.
>
> It provides voltage regulators, GPIO controller, Touch Screen, RTC, Battery
> control and othe
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:07:00PM +0530, ashishj3 wrote:
> The DA9052 is a highly integrated PMIC subsystem with supply domain
> flexibility
> to support wide range of high performance application.
>
> It provides voltage regulators, GPIO controller, Touch Screen, RTC, Battery
> control and othe
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
wrote:
> On 7/21/2011 3:57 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:32:12AM +0100, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>
>>> Lorenzo, Colin,
>>>
>>> On 7/7/2011 9:20 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
From: Colin Cross
Wh
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 03:22:58PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, John Rigby wrote:
> > >
> > >> My first request would be for board level device tree support.
> > >
Somehow, cc: to linaro-dev ended with Delivery Failure when sending
original mail.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:24:42 +0300
From: Paul Sokolovsky
To: repo-disc...@googlegroups.com
Cc: linaro-dev
Subject: How Gerrit decides when change is "Merged"?
Hello,
I have follow
On Thursday 21 July 2011 16:47:48 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:46:32PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:07:00PM +0530, ashishj3 wrote:
>
> > > + mutex_lock_interruptible(&da9052->io_lock);
>
> > Compile warning as below.
>
> > "warning: ignoring return v
All builds also ship with a MM framework. Take a look at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/MultimediaTest
You'll need the SDK to build the source.
PandaBoard Linaro Evaluation Build RC Preview
--
Linux-3.0.0-rc7+, Linaro
On 21 July 2011 16:05, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> All builds also ship with a MM framework. Take a look at:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/MultimediaTest
>
> You'll need the SDK to build the source.
>
>
> PandaBoard Linaro Evaluation Build RC Preview
> --
You can pull devicetree/next right now. I've still got a few things
to do before I get you to pull the dt board support patches. Give me
a few more hours.
g.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 03:22:58PM
> From: linux-arm-kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-arm-
> kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Russell King - ARM Linux
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:32:25PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > A quick poll of the ARM platforms that implement CPU Hotplug support
> > shows
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> You can pull devicetree/next right now. I've still got a few things
> to do before I get you to pull the dt board support patches. Give me
> a few more hours.
No problem. I can wait until I go to bed.
Nicolas
___
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>> You can pull devicetree/next right now. I've still got a few things
>> to do before I get you to pull the dt board support patches. Give me
>> a few more hours.
>
> No problem. I can wait until
Okay, here it is.
The following changes since commit 57a6fa9acd6b4a479a6ede4d6d2258f04afd3a6f:
Merge branch 'x86-urgent-for-linus' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
(2011-07-21 12:25:39 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.secretlab.ca/gi
On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> Please let me know if you want to see something merged into the
>> linaro-3.0 tree before Thursday.
>
> So I'm working on merging this into the Android tree and something in
> your tree is causi
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:32:25PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> A quick poll of the ARM platforms that implement CPU Hotplug support
>> shows that every platform treats CPU 0 as a special case that cannot be
>> hotplugged. In
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> >> You can pull devicetree/next right now. I've still got a few things
> >> to do before I get you to pull the dt board support patches. Give me
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:18 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> Please let me know if you want to see something merged into the
> >> linaro-3.0 tree before Thursday.
> >
> > So I'm working on merg
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:34 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:18 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> > On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > >> Please let me know if you want to see something merged into the
> > >>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:46:32PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:07:00PM +0530, ashishj3 wrote:
> > + mutex_lock_interruptible(&da9052->io_lock);
> Compile warning as below.
> "warning: ignoring return value of ‘mutex_lock_interruptible’,
> declared with attribute warn_u
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:47 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:34 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:18 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> > > On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > >> Please
On 21 July 2011 16:47, john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:34 -0700, john stultz wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:18 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> > On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> > >> Please let me know if
The Linaro Validation team is pleased to announce the latest release of
LAVA, for the 2011.07 milestone.
LAVA is the Linaro Automated Validation Architecture that Linaro is
deploying to automate the testing of Linaro images and components on
supported development boards.
One of the biggest change
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On 21 July 2011 16:47, john stultz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:34 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:18 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> >> > On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz wrote:
> >> > > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400
Given the focus of my team's efforts, it's perhaps a bit silly that we
haven't been running our own tests regularly. In any case, I've just
set up a quick n' dirty jenkins job that sets up lava-dev-tool, runs
lava-dev-tool sequence and puts the results here:
http://validation.linaro.org/jenkins/j
On 7/21/2011 7:00 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:03:04AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Just talking on behalf of OMAP, we can't offline CPU0 and limitation
would remain in future OMAPs too.
Apart from the broken IRQ migration, and the way CPU0 immediately
reaw
On 7/22/2011 12:36 AM, Colin Cross wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
wrote:
On 7/21/2011 3:57 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:32:12AM +0100, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Lorenzo, Colin,
On 7/7/2011 9:20 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
From: Colin
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
wrote:
> On 7/22/2011 12:36 AM, Colin Cross wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/21/2011 3:57 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:32:12AM +0100, Santosh Shilimkar w
Does the job always uninstall the previous installed packages?
On 22 July 2011 12:24, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> Given the focus of my team's efforts, it's perhaps a bit silly that we
> haven't been running our own tests regularly. In any case, I've just
> set up a quick n' dirty jenkins job
41 matches
Mail list logo
