-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/01/2011 02:24 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>
>> When all tests will be finished I wish to switch the new way test suite
>> execution in lava, if it is possible.
>>
> Given that the old tests
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Joey Stanford wrote:
> Excellent work everyone. This is a superb release!
Ack++ ... this release is just amazing! Thanks to everyone for their hard work!
... on to 10.07 now!
--
- Alexander
___
linaro-dev mailing
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Joey Stanford wrote:
>> Excellent work everyone. This is a superb release!
>
> Ack++ ... this release is just amazing! Thanks to everyone for their hard
> work!
>
> ... on to 10.07 now!
and of course, let
On 28 June 2011 10:11, Per Forlin wrote:
> Add four tests for read and write performance per
> different transfer size, 4k to 4M.
> * Read using blocking mmc request
> * Read using non-blocking mmc request
> * Write using blocking mmc request
> * Write using non-blocking mmc request
>
> The ho
On 28 June 2011 10:11, Per Forlin wrote:
> test that measures how the mmc bandwidth depends on the numbers of sg elements
> in the sg list. The transfer size if fixed and sg length goes from a few up
> to 512. The purpose is to measure overhead caused by multiple sg elements.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pe
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 09:15:27AM -0400, ashishj3 wrote:
> The DA9052 PMIC provides an Analogue to Digital Converter with 10 bits
> resolution and 10 channels.
>
> This patch montiors the DA9052 PMIC's ADC channels mostly for battery
> parameters
> like battery temperature, junction temperature,
> -Original Message-
> From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:guenter.ro...@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 7:52 PM
> To: Ashish Jangam
> Cc: randy.dun...@oracle.com; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; dc...@diasemi.com;
> linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
> Subject: Re:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/01/2011 02:24 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> > wrote:
> >
> >> When all tests will be finished I wish to switch the new way test suite
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/01/2011 04:28 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/01/2011 02:24 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Daniel L
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
> This is done by making the issue_rw_rq() non-blocking.
> The increase in throughput is proportional to the time it takes to
> prepare (major part of preparations is dma_map_sg and dma_unmap_sg)
> a request and how fast the memory is. The faste
We have both desktop (for general graphics/media stuff) and mobile
tracks at this year's LPC.
So if you're working on a topic related to one of the above areas,
especially one that has open issues or spans multiple parts of the
stack, please submit a topic for discussion at
http://www.linuxplumber
On Thursday 30 June 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> We've been here before - with PCMCIA's card insertion code, where you
> have to go through a sequence of events (insert, power up, reset, etc).
> The PCMCIA code used to have a collection of small functions to do
> each step, one chained a
Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req()
to start and wait for a request. This patch adds
* mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting
If there is on ongoing request wait for completion
of that request and start the new one and return.
Does not wait for the n
How significant is the cache maintenance over head?
It depends, the eMMC are much faster now
compared to a few years ago and cache maintenance cost more due to
multiple cache levels and speculative cache pre-fetch. In relation the
cost for handling the caches have increased and is now a bottle neck
pre_req() runs dma_map_sg() and prepares the dma descriptor
for the next mmc data transfer. post_req() runs dma_unmap_sg.
If not calling pre_req() before mmci_request(), mmci_request()
will prepare the cache and dma just like it did it before.
It is optional to use pre_req() and post_req() for mmci
pre_req() runs dma_map_sg(), post_req() runs dma_unmap_sg.
If not calling pre_req() before omap_hsmmc_request()
dma_map_sg will be issued before starting the transfer.
It is optional to use pre_req(). If issuing pre_req()
post_req() must be to be called as well.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
Reviewed
Add a debugfs file "testlist" to print all available tests
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S
Tested-by: Sourav Poddar
Tested-by: Linus Walleij
---
drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c | 39 ++-
1
Add four tests for read and write performance per
different transfer size, 4k to 4M.
* Read using blocking mmc request
* Read using non-blocking mmc request
* Write using blocking mmc request
* Write using non-blocking mmc request
The host dirver must support pre_req() and post_req()
in order
test that measures how the mmc bandwidth depends on the numbers of sg elements
in the sg list. The transfer size if fixed and sg length goes from a few up
to 512. The purpose is to measure overhead caused by multiple sg elements.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
Acked-by: Arnd B
Break out code without functional changes. This simplifies the code and
makes way for handle two parallel request.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S
Tested-by: Sourav Poddar
Tested-by: Linus Walleij
---
drivers/mmc/card/block
The way the request data is organized in the mmc queue struct
it only allows processing of one request at the time.
This patch adds a new struct to hold mmc queue request data such as
sg list, request, blk request and bounce buffers, and updates any functions
depending on the mmc queue struct. This
Add an additional mmc queue request instance to make way for
two active block requests. One request may be active while the
other request is being prepared.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S
Tested-by: Sourav Poddar
Tested-by:
Break out code from mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq to create a
block request prepare function. This doesn't change
any functionallity. This helps when handling more
than one active block request.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
Reviewed-by: Venkatraman S
Tested-b
This simple fault injection proved to be very useful to
test the error handling in the block.c rw_rq(). It may
still be useful to test if the host driver handle
pre_req() and post_req() correctly in case of errors.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
Review
Change mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() to become asynchronous.
The execution flow looks like this:
The mmc-queue calls issue_rw_rq(), which sends the request
to the host and returns back to the mmc-queue. The mmc-queue calls
issue_rw_rq() again with a new request. This new request is prepared,
in isuue_rw_rq
Hi All,
I've just submitted the patches for the 64 bit atomic stuff to the
gcc-patches list.
Richard Henderson has raised the question of why the ARM commpage isn't a full
VDSO and, if it was, then it would make the version number check a lot simpler.
What's the history behind this/how big a job
Hi all,
I was looking at git.linaro.org and I'd like to propose some consistency
in naming our git trees and in how we branch them. The main reason
for this from my perspective is to make it easy to point someone
from a partner team or from a partner''s customer to the git server and
have them qui
On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
What I'd like to see is a a separate set of official trees that only
get updated with bits that
we are ready for non-Linaro developers to use, do not get rebased, and
get tagged at the
end of each monthly cycle. My proposal:
ker
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 07:43:30AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Changes since v3 :
> * Update the format of printk message
> * Remove blank line
Can I trouble you to check the patch for more instances of the 'blank line
at end of function' thing... Also, let's get rid of unnecessary parens.
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
