[Android: build.git] Create uInitrd instead of ramdisk.img

2011-04-19 Thread Patrik Ryd
In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage and uInitrd. This patch is Linaro specific and should not be contibuted to AOSP. --- core/Makefile |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/core/Makefile b/core/Makefile index 857dd20..f75832a 100644 --- a/core/Ma

Re: [Android: build.git] Create uInitrd instead of ramdisk.img

2011-04-19 Thread Alexander Sack
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Patrik Ryd wrote: > -       $(hide) $(MKBOOTFS) $(TARGET_ROOT_OUT) | $(MINIGZIP) > $@ > +       $(hide) $(MKBOOTFS) $(TARGET_ROOT_OUT) | $(MINIGZIP) > > $(PRODUCT_OUT)/obj/temp_ramdisk.img > +       mkimage -A arm -O linux -T ramdisk -n "Android Ramdisk Image" -d

Re: [Android: build.git] Create uInitrd instead of ramdisk.img

2011-04-19 Thread Patrik Ryd
On 19 April 2011 10:39, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Patrik Ryd wrote: >> -       $(hide) $(MKBOOTFS) $(TARGET_ROOT_OUT) | $(MINIGZIP) > $@ >> +       $(hide) $(MKBOOTFS) $(TARGET_ROOT_OUT) | $(MINIGZIP) > >> $(PRODUCT_OUT)/obj/temp_ramdisk.img >> +       mkimage -A

[PATCH v2 Android: build.git 1/2] Rename the kernel to uImage for Linaro Android build

2011-04-19 Thread Patrik Ryd
In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel). This patch is Linaro specific and should not be contibuted to AOSP. --- target/board/Android.mk |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/board/Android.mk b/target/board/Android.mk index 8

[PATCH v2 Android: build.git 2/2] Create uInitrd instead of ramdisk.img

2011-04-19 Thread Patrik Ryd
In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage and uInitrd. This patch is Linaro specific and should not be contibuted to AOSP. --- core/Makefile |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/core/Makefile b/core/Makefile index 857dd20..79d59a5 100644 --- a/core/Ma

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] S5P: GPIO Macro Values Corrected.

2011-04-19 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Chander Kashyap, On 18 April 2011 19:08, Chander Kashyap wrote: > S5PC2XX: Macro values for Pull Up and Driver Strength were wrong. > S5PC1XX: Macro values for Driver Strength were wrong. > > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap > --- > > Changes for V2: >        - Macro value order fixed. >    

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] S5P:SROM config code moved to s5p-common directory

2011-04-19 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Chander Kashyap On 15 April 2011 14:05, Chander Kashyap wrote: > SROM config code is made common for S5P series of boards. > smdkc100.c now refers to s5p-common/sromc.c for SROM related > subroutines. > > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap > --- >  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/Makefile    |  

Re: [Android: device/linaro/common] Rename the kernel to uImage for Linaro Android build

2011-04-19 Thread Patrik Ryd
On 18 April 2011 08:46, Jim Huang wrote: > On 18 April 2011 14:40,   wrote: >> From: Patrik Ryd >> >> In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel). >> --- >>  tasks/kernel.mk |    4 ++-- >>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > hi Patrik, > > Does this imp

Re: [PATCH 2/5] mmc: sdhci: eliminate sdhci_of_host and sdhci_of_data

2011-04-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > The patch is to migrate the use of sdhci_of_host and sdhci_of_data > to sdhci_pltfm_host and sdhci_pltfm_data, so that the former pair can > be eliminated. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo > --- [...] > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci

Re: [PATCH 1/5] mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-pltfm device drivers self registered

2011-04-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:47PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > The patch turns the common stuff in sdhci-pltfm.c into functions, and > add device drivers their own .probe and .remove which in turn call > into the common functions, so that those sdhci-pltfm device drivers > register itself and keep a

Re: [PATCH 0/5] consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered

2011-04-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hi Shawn, On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:46PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > Here are what the patch set does. > > * Remove .probe and .remove hooks from sdhci-pltfm.c and make it be > a pure common helper function providers. > * Add .probe and .remove hooks for sdhci pltfm drivers sdhci-cns3xxx, >

Re: [PATCH 3/5] mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-of device drivers self registered

2011-04-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
> +static int __devinit sdhci_esdhc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct sdhci_host *host; > + int ret; > + > + host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, &sdhci_esdhc_pdata); > + if (!host) > + return -ENOMEM; Just noticed: Since pltfm_init may fail due to various r

Re: [PATCH 4/5] mmc: sdhci: consolidate sdhci-of-esdhc and sdhci-esdhc-imx

2011-04-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
> config MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX > - bool "SDHCI platform support for the Freescale eSDHC i.MX controller" > + bool "SDHCI support for the Freescale eSDHC i.MX controller" > depends on ARCH_MX25 || ARCH_MX35 || ARCH_MX5 > depends on MMC_SDHCI > - select MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM > +

Re: [PATCH 5/5] mmc: sdhci: merge two sdhci-pltfm.h into one

2011-04-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:51PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > The structure sdhci_pltfm_data is not necessarily to be in a public > header like include/linux/mmc/sdhci-pltfm.h, so the patch moves it > into drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.h and eliminates the former one. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo

Re: [PATCH 0/5] consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered

2011-04-19 Thread Kyungmin Park
Hi, BTW, Are there reason to omit the sdhci-s3c.c? Maybe Mr. Jung will handle it. Thank you, Kyungmin Park On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:46PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: >> Here are what the patch set does. >> >> * Remove .probe a

Testing IGEP DT support (was: Device Tree on ARM status report - Mar 20)

2011-04-19 Thread Grant Likely
Hi Mounir, Took me a while, but here are the instructions for testing DT support on IGEP: The current nightly u-boot builds should work out-of-the-box with device tree support. You can use the prebuilt binaries >From what I can tell, the kernel build doesn't yet have DT enabled for any of the p

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

2011-04-19 Thread Jae hoon Chung
Hi Per.. 2011/4/11 Per Forlin : > On 9 April 2011 13:55, Jae hoon Chung wrote: >> Hi Per.. >> >> I'm applied your patch..and sent the patch about dw_mmc.c. >> I think good this approach.. >> > Do you have any test results from the mmc_tests I added? > I am interested in the results. I didn't tes

Re: [PATCH 0/5] consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered

2011-04-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
> BTW, Are there reason to omit the sdhci-s3c.c? Maybe Mr. Jung will handle it. The difference is that sdhci-s3c.c was more like a fork of sdhci-pltfm while the others were users of it. With the new interface, s3c can be converted using pltfm more easily. If somebody is willing to do that, this i

Re: u-boot + Android 'fastboot' protocol/commands support (was: [Android: device/linaro/common] Rename the kernel to uImage for Linaro Android build)

2011-04-19 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jim Huang, In message you wrote: > > My idea is that we require abstract 'bootloader' component in Android > device/linaro/common, and (patched) 'u-boot' would be the provider of > 'bootloader' component in > device/linaro/Linaro-Evaluation-Build-Hardware. Also, supporting If you are discu

[PATCH android/frameworks/base] libagl: Enable CLZ instruction generation for TextureObjectManager

2011-04-19 Thread Jim Huang
Change-Id: I54cb4755b64076007a5f631f1faa7eab2272f6e6 Code Review: https://review.source.android.com/#change,22409 From 89d418d731fa061508e514824751220a0e10de0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Huang Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 02:39:28 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] libagl: Enable CLZ instruction genera

[PATCH android/bionic 0/3] Reduce code size of libc and libm by GCC visibility

2011-04-19 Thread Jim Huang
The following set of Android bionic patches use GCC visibility pragma to hide the private symbols in bionic. It also lets the optimizer produce better and smaller machine code. [PATCH android/bionic 1/3] Hide private symbols using GCC visibility pragma [PATCH android/bionic 2/3] Hide internal symb

[PATCH android/bionic 1/3] Hide private symbols using GCC visibility pragma

2011-04-19 Thread Jim Huang
libc.so should not export all private symbols to reflect Android NDK. This patch attempts to use GCC visibility pragma to hide the private symbols in bionic. It also lets the optimizer produce better and smaller code. Reference code size measurements for HTC Passion: $ arm-eabi-size out/target/pro

[PATCH android/bionic 2/3] Hide internal symbol __bionic_brk used by brk() and sbrk()

2011-04-19 Thread Jim Huang
__bionic_brk was shared by brk() and sbrk(), which should be implementor specific and hidden to application developers. Code Review: https://review.source.android.com/#change,17364 From 7452bce8defc06a34612b25ace2ef802c0579a83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Huang Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 04

[PATCH android/bionic 3/3] Hide libm private symbols using GCC visibility pragma

2011-04-19 Thread Jim Huang
Following the visibility changes in libc.so, this patch attempts to hide private symbols in libm.so. Reference code size measurements for HTC Passion: $ arm-eabi-size out/target/product/passion/system/lib/libm.so [before] textdata bss dec hex filename 88423 256 32

Re: [RFF] Patch tracking/metrics

2011-04-19 Thread James Westby
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:54:55 +1200, Michael Hope wrote: > Hmm. We already do patch tracking in Linaro GCC to make sure that all > patches go upstream. It's a manual process as the GCC workflow itself > is very manual. > > I don't want to manually update two places when a patch changes state. >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered

2011-04-19 Thread Kyungmin Park
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> BTW, Are there reason to omit the sdhci-s3c.c? Maybe Mr. Jung will handle it. > > The difference is that sdhci-s3c.c was more like a fork of sdhci-pltfm while > the others were users of it. With the new interface, s3c can be converted > us

patch set for powerdebug working items

2011-04-19 Thread yong . shen
The first two patches had been post long time before, so I did not add 'v2' to them. They includes some comments from Daniel Lezcano. The last two patches are for working items defined for powerdebug. ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro

[PATCH 1/4] resolve clock_info reallocationg issue

2011-04-19 Thread yong . shen
From: Yong Shen everytime when screen refresh, the clock_info data stucture will be reacclocated, which does not make sence. This patch addresses this issue. Signed-off-by: Yong Shen --- clocks.c | 204 -- clocks.h |3 +- pow

[PATCH 2/4] Utilize inotify to detect debugfs changes

2011-04-19 Thread yong . shen
From: Yong Shen Signed-off-by: Yong Shen --- clocks.c | 56 +++- 1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/clocks.c b/clocks.c index dc5c03b..25588f7 100644 --- a/clocks.c +++ b/clocks.c @@ -16,12 +16,18 @@ #include

[PATCH 3/4] add sorting feature into powerdebug

2011-04-19 Thread yong . shen
From: Yong Shen push 'S' key to switch to 'sorting' mode, all the clocks will be sorted by their name. Signed-off-by: Yong Shen --- clocks.c | 140 +- display.c| 16 --- powerdebug.c | 25 +- powerdebug.h | 17 +

[PATCH 4/4] Make 'status' and 'state' of regulator a little bit clearer

2011-04-19 Thread yong . shen
From: Yong Shen Add a simple postfix to 'status' and 'state' when displaying regulator information, to emphasis that 'status' is about hardware status while 'state' is a software concept. Signed-off-by: Yong Shen --- display.c |4 ++-- regulator.c |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertio