[PATCH] only refresh when the clock tree is changed in debugfs

This patch is for working item "Allocate the data structures only once instead of at every refresh" at https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/linaro-pm-wg/+spec/a-new-tool-to-display-arm-specific-info. source code: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=tools/powerdebug.git;a=summary git tree: git://git.

[PATCH] only refresh when the clock tree is changed in debugfs

From: Yong Shen add a inotify watch on clock tree, only when clock tree is changed, the clock info structure is rebuild and screen will be refreshed. Signed-off-by: Yong Shen --- clocks.c | 51 +++ powerdebug.c |6 +- powerdebug.h |

Re: linaro android build system issues

On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:49:12 +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > I did the first step yesterday: > https://github.com/jenkinsci/ec2-plugin/pull/7 Great, thanks. > Whether I do the rest is up to you to some extent I guess :-) It's > probably around a day's work. I think it's worth following t

Re: [RFC] kprobes with thumb2 conditional code

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Tixy wrote: > Hello All > > I'm about to start work on getting kprobes working with thumb2. > > One of the issues I have is that when probes are placed onto > conditionally executed instructions in a IT block, they may not fire if > the condition is not met. This i

Linaro 11.05 weekly testing 2011-03-17

Hi, This is a message sent out once per week to call on our community to help test the Linaro evaluation builds we produce. If you have supported hardware, as found on: http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/ please help our initiative by testing the official Linaro Evaluation

Re: [PATCH-Android] Patches to build Android using GCC 4.5/4.6.

Hi, I think your patches are good enough (now after the review) to start pushing them to a toolchain_preview branch. That way people can use the toolchain_preview branch when working with the toolchain. At the same time someone can try to replace some of your patches with solutions that solves th

beagleXM, hwpacks : a newbie question

Hi all, I am trying to get the network to work with qemu-system-arm -M beaglexm but without success. I followed the instructions at https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/MilestoneBuilds and booted a virtual machine for a beagle XM. But there is not network interface. After googling it appears t

Re: [PATCH V5 1/4] arm/dt: add basic mx51 device tree support

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:51:38PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jason Liu > --- > arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig |8 > arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile |1 + > arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-dt.c| 64 > +++ > arch/arm/ma

Re: [PATCH V5 2/4] arm/dt: add very basic dts file for babbage board

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:51:39PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote: > Singed-off-by: Rob Herring > Signed-off-by: Jason Liu > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts | 122 > + > 1 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/b

Re: [PATCH V5 3/4] serial/imx: parse from device tree support

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:51:40PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr > Signed-off-by: Jason Liu > --- > .../bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt | 19 + > drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 78 > +--- > 2 files changed, 87 i

Overo Clock Rate

Ash Charles of Gumstix recently noted that the Linaro image for Overo seemed to perform slower than the one they create. I've spent a little time investigating this. I'm not familiar with this type of code and apologize if my terminology is off. However, I think there's an issue in the Linaro uboo

Re: beagleXM, hwpacks : a newbie question

Hi Daniel, On 03/17/2011 10:30 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to get the network to work with qemu-system-arm -M beaglexm > but without success. > > I followed the instructions at > https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/MilestoneBuilds and booted a virtual > machine for a beagle

Re: beagleXM, hwpacks : a newbie question

On 03/17/2011 05:46 PM, Matt Waddel wrote: Hi Daniel, On 03/17/2011 10:30 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: Hi all, I am trying to get the network to work with qemu-system-arm -M beaglexm but without success. I followed the instructions at https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/MilestoneBuilds and booted a

Re: No support of platform device instance id?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:31:15PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 05:05:00PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > > [...] > > I'd like to have feedback on the new code to make sure that the model > > is sane. There are some fiddly code it there which is used to match > > platform_dev

Re: [PATCH V4 1/5] arm/dt: add basic mx51 device tree support

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:54:35AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:03:42AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > > > +static struct clk *mx5_dt_clk_get(struct device_node *np, > > > + const char *output_id, void *data) > > > +{ > >

Re: Overo Clock Rate

Thanks for the excellent writeup! For u-boot, I find this a bit surprizing as I thought Overo was well supported in upstream u-boot; in any case, please do file a bug against u-boot-linaro on this. It's quite likely patches not yet upstream to u-boot which we might find in Steve Sakoman's tr

Re: [PATCH] ARM: Samsung: Basic CPUIDLE Support

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Amit Kachhap wrote: > Hi nicolas, > > Can you merge this patch for adding basic cpuidle support? This may be > needed for the current linaro release cycle. Sorry for the delay -- I'm emerging from my vacation backlog. Because of some upstream changes to the Samsung code th

Re: [PATCH 00/12][RFC] Intial Kconfig Fragment Demo

On 11 Mar 16, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Amit Kucheria wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Dave Martin > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Andy Green wrote: > > >> On 03/09/2011 09:04 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > >> > > I take

Re: beagleXM, hwpacks : a newbie question

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 03/17/2011 05:46 PM, Matt Waddel wrote: >> >> Hi Daniel, >> >> On 03/17/2011 10:30 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am trying to get the network to work with qemu-system-arm -M beaglexm >>> but without success. >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH 3/7] mmc: make the reference to sdhci_tegra_dt_pdata conditional

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:25:55PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: >> Wrap tegra dt_id with CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_TEGRA to make the reference to >> sdhci_tegra_dt_pdata conditional, otherwise it will stop build for >> other mmc driver when OF is enabled. >

Re: [PATCH 5/7] mmc: support sdhci-esdhc-imx as an OF device

[cc'ing linux-mmc to continue this discussion] On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:39:16PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:59:26PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:25:57PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo > > > > dt support can be added

Re: [PATCH 4/7] mmc: consolidate sdhci_pltfm_data and sdhci_of_data into one

[cc'ing linux-...@vger.kernel.org] On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:33:20PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:55:13PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:25:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > This patch is motivated by the work of supporting sdhci-esdhc-imx as >

Re: [PATCH 5/7] mmc: support sdhci-esdhc-imx as an OF device

On 03/17/2011 03:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote: [cc'ing linux-mmc to continue this discussion] On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:39:16PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:59:26PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:25:57PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: Signed-off-by: Shawn G

Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm/dt: mx51: dynamically add gpt and uart related clocks per dt nodes

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:04:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:37:31AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 12:22:10AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > This patch is to change the static clock creating and registering to > > > the dynamic way, which scans dt

Re: beagleXM, hwpacks : a newbie question

On 03/17/2011 08:42 PM, Michael Hope wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 03/17/2011 05:46 PM, Matt Waddel wrote: Hi Daniel, On 03/17/2011 10:30 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: Hi all, I am trying to get the network to work with qemu-system-arm -M beaglexm but without

Re: [PATCH] Include support for the new u8500 hardware pack

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:30:03 -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 16:49 +, Lee Jones wrote: > > linaro-media-create dies whilst looking for ux500 based files. This > > amendment allows it to work with old and new hardware packs alike. > > > > Thanks for the p

Re: [RFC] kprobes with thumb2 conditional code

On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Dave Martin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Tixy wrote: > > Hello All > > > > I'm about to start work on getting kprobes working with thumb2. > > > > One of the issues I have is that when probes are placed onto > > conditionally executed instructions in a IT block,

Re: Better reviews for the same cost in gcc-linaro

We (especially jameinel) looked into this a bit more, and he has a patch that speeds up some of these cases quite a lot: . Martin ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 3/7] mmc: make the reference to sdhci_tegra_dt_pdata conditional

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:59:00PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Grant Likely > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:25:55PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > >> Wrap tegra dt_id with CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_TEGRA to make the reference to > >> sdhci_tegra_dt_pdata conditional, o

Re: [PATCH V5 2/4] arm/dt: add very basic dts file for babbage board

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:42:38AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:51:39PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote: [...] > > + aips@83f0 { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + compatible = "simple-bus"; > > + ranges = <0x0

Re: [PATCH V5 1/4] arm/dt: add basic mx51 device tree support

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:37:32AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:51:38PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jason Liu > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig |8 > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile |1 + > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/boar

Re: Overo Clock Rate

On 03/17/2011 10:28 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > Thanks for the excellent writeup! For u-boot, I find this a bit > surprizing as I thought Overo was well supported in upstream u-boot; in > any case, please do file a bug against u-boot-linaro on this. It's > quite likely patches not yet upstream t

Re: Getting rid of update-alternative in cross toolchain packages

On 15.03.2011 17:09, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:00:04PM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> Some time ago I looked at cross toolchain packages to find how they >> handle installation of several versions at same time. It was done by >> using 'update-alternatives' tool and was

Re: [PATCH 3/7] mmc: make the reference to sdhci_tegra_dt_pdata conditional

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:22:03AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:59:00PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Grant Likely > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:25:55PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > >> Wrap tegra dt_id with CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_TE

Re: [PATCH V5 1/4] arm/dt: add basic mx51 device tree support

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:19:19AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:37:32AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:51:38PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Liu > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig |8 > > > arch/

Re: [PATCH V5 2/4] arm/dt: add very basic dts file for babbage board

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:49:17AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:42:38AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:51:39PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote: > [...] > > > + aips@83f0 { > > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > > +

Re: [PATCH-Android] Patches to build Android using GCC 4.5/4.6.

On 17 March 2011 23:35, Patrik Ryd wrote: > Hi, > I think your patches are good enough (now after the review) to start pushing > them to a toolchain_preview branch. That way people can use > the toolchain_preview branch when working with the toolchain. > At the same time someone can try to replace