Linaro QEMU package in Ubuntu?

2010-12-08 Thread Jani Monoses
Hello, one of the Ubuntu blueprints for 11.04 is to provide a QEMU better suited to Linaro/ARM work in the official archives, allowing to test at least the official Ubuntu ARM images. The Linaro PPA provides a package based on qemu-maemo from gitorious, and it is ahead of what is packaged in t

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of do_wfi() forCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL

2010-12-08 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia wtorek, 7 grudnia 2010 o 17:50:50 Dave Martin napisał(a): > You can't built a kernel for pre-v7 platforms with > CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL: the code can't run on those platforms because > they don't support Thumb-2. > > So anything inside #ifdef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL can assume v7/Thumb-2 > capable

Re: Linaro QEMU package in Ubuntu?

2010-12-08 Thread Peter Maydell
On 8 December 2010 08:53, Jani Monoses wrote: > one of the Ubuntu blueprints for 11.04 is to provide a QEMU better suited to > Linaro/ARM work in the official archives, allowing to > at least the official Ubuntu ARM images. > > The Linaro PPA provides a package based on qemu-maemo from gitorious,

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: omap: Enable low-level omap3 PM code to work withCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL

2010-12-08 Thread Dave Martin
Hi, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Dave Martin wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Dave Martin wrote: >> [...] >> > Note that converting to C doesn't mean that code which attempts to >> > copy function bodies will work: you still need to handle

Re: RFC: Dynamic hwcaps

2010-12-08 Thread Dave Martin
Hi, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Ben Dooks wrote: [...] > > Could you do what the original FP did, and start with units off and use > the first use of $unit in the process to turn it on? Do things like NEON > support this? > Actually, this is still done -- it's the same code since NEON and

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of do_wfi() forCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL

2010-12-08 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia wtorek, 7 grudnia 2010 o 17:50:50 Dave Martin napisał(a): >> You can't built a kernel for pre-v7 platforms with >> CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL: the code can't run on those platforms because >> they don't support Thumb-2. >> >> So anything i

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of do_wfi() forCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL

2010-12-08 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > Dave, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Santosh Shilimkar [mailto:santosh.shilim...@ti.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:27 AM >> To: Dave Martin >> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Tony Lindgren; linux- >> o...

RE: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of do_wfi() forCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL

2010-12-08 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
> -Original Message- > From: Dave Martin [mailto:dave.mar...@linaro.org] > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:11 PM > To: Santosh Shilimkar > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Tony Lindgren; linux- > o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] A

Re: Linaro QEMU package in Ubuntu?

2010-12-08 Thread Jani Monoses
The Linaro PPA provides a package based on qemu-maemo from gitorious, and it is ahead of what is packaged in that it supports the BeagleBoard. Yes. At the moment I think that something based on that tree is your best practical choice if you want neon support and certainly if you need omap3. t

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of do_wfi() forCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL

2010-12-08 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Dave Martin [mailto:dave.mar...@linaro.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:11 PM >> To: Santosh Shilimkar >> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Tony Lindgren; linux- >> o...@vger.kernel

Re: RFC: Dynamic hwcaps

2010-12-08 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Dave Martin wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Thomas Petazzoni >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:28:27 + >> > Dave Martin wrote: >> > >> >> This allows for more active power management of such functional >> >> bl

Re: RFC: Dynamic hwcaps

2010-12-08 Thread Jamie Lokier
Dave Martin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Thomas Petazzoni > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:28:27 + > > Dave Martin wrote: > > > >> This allows for more active power management of such functional > >> blocks: if the CPU is not fully loaded, you can turn them off -- th

RE: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of do_wfi() forCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL

2010-12-08 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
> -Original Message- > From: Dave Martin [mailto:dave.mar...@linaro.org] > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:35 PM > To: Santosh Shilimkar > Cc: Tony Lindgren; linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro- > d...@lists.linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3]

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of do_wfi() forCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL

2010-12-08 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Dave Martin [mailto:dave.mar...@linaro.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:35 PM >> To: Santosh Shilimkar >> Cc: Tony Lindgren; linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro- >> d...@lists.linaro.org; li

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: omap4: Correct definition of do_wfi() forCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL

2010-12-08 Thread Dave Martin
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:50:50PM +, Dave Martin wrote: >> I'll follow up shortly with a patch to the generic ARM Kconfig to make >> this explicit, so that ARCH_OMAP2 and THUMB2_KERNEL can't accidentally >> be configured togeth

Re: license for setup_sdcard.sh

2010-12-08 Thread Guilherme Salgado
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 15:33 +, Dave Martin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > > Hi Guilherme, > > > >> I know you found a workaround with fdisk so you're probably no longer > >> using parted, but I was wondering if you were able to use parted to > >> chang

Re: license for setup_sdcard.sh

2010-12-08 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 15:33 +, Dave Martin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Robert Nelson >> wrote: >> > Hi Guilherme, >> > >> >> I know you found a workaround with fdisk so you're probably no longer >> >> using pa

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: omap: Enable low-level omap3 PM code to work withCONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL

2010-12-08 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Dave Martin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Nicolas Pitre > wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Dave Martin wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Dave Martin wrote: > >> [...] > >> > Note that converting to C doesn't mean that code which attempts to >

Re: Linaro QEMU package in Ubuntu?

2010-12-08 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 December 2010 08:53, Jani Monoses wrote: >> one of the Ubuntu blueprints for 11.04 is to provide a QEMU better suited to >> Linaro/ARM work in the official archives, allowing to >> at least the official Ubuntu ARM images. >> >> The Linar

Re: Linaro QEMU package in Ubuntu?

2010-12-08 Thread Peter Maydell
On 8 December 2010 17:50, Ricardo Salveti wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: >> On 8 December 2010 08:53, Jani Monoses wrote: >>> one of the Ubuntu blueprints for 11.04 is to provide a QEMU better suited to >>> Linaro/ARM work in the official archives, allowing to >

Re: Linaro QEMU package in Ubuntu?

2010-12-08 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 December 2010 17:50, Ricardo Salveti wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Peter Maydell >> wrote: >>> On 8 December 2010 08:53, Jani Monoses wrote: one of the Ubuntu blueprints for 11.04 is to provide a QEMU better suited >

[ACTIVITY] Toolchain WG 2010-11-03

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Hope
Here's what the toolchain group has been doing: * 2010.12 release is coming up. Bug list is in a good way. Build is good, test results are good. * Atomic memory operations are finished, in GCC, in GLIBC, and in Ubuntu. Coverage report is done at [[WorkingGroups/ToolChain/AtomicMemoryOperation

Re: [PATCH] export clock debug information to user space

2010-12-08 Thread Jeremy Kerr
Hi Yong, We're getting pretty close - just a couple of changes: > + } else { > + struct preinit_clk *p; > + mutex_lock(&preinit_lock); > + p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!p) > + goto unlock; > +

Re: [PATCH] export clock debug information to user space

2010-12-08 Thread Yong Shen
hi Jeremy, It's nice to be close :). And it seems that many people in arm kernel list are also intested in the clock debug information, maybe we can post next version to that list and let them know how things are going. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > Hi Yong, > > We're get

Re: [PATCH] export clock debug information to user space

2010-12-08 Thread Jeremy Kerr
Hi Yong, > >> +static int __init clk_debugfs_init(void) > >> +{ > >> + struct preinit_clk *pclk, *tmp; > >> + > >> + if (debugfs_initialized()) > >> + init_done = 1; > > > > No need to check debugfs_initialised() here; if it's not initialised > > we're in trouble anyway. > >