On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:50:03PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:28:26AM +0100, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> > OK, I put together:
> >
> > http://wiki.linaro.org/Process/ReleaseTesting
> >
> > As we are starting to produce a number of images now, I've split them u
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
>
> As we are starting to produce a number of images now, I've split them up
> into two categories, 'Primary' and 'Secondary'. Of course it would be
> nice if all images were tested but if we can get through the Primary
> ones each week that wo
Hi,
notes and actions from our Monday graphics and multimedia cross-vendor
call are available on the wiki:
+ https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/2010-09-27
Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here:
+
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics#W
Hi everyone,
The minutes of the weekly call can be found at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2010-09-29
Attendees:
Linaro: Amit Kucheria, Amit Arora, Vincent, Yong
ARM: Srinivas Kalaga
Highlight: Discussion on PM QA validation
Regards,
Amit
__
On 10 Sep 27, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have only 43 (or 42 depending on your timezone) days until the Linaro
> final release [1] and
> as we get closer, the need for more structured testing is essential. An idea
> that has been
> incubating for some time is to have a weekly 'test day'
Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Indeed. And that's exactly what I'm looking for in order to produce the
> linaro-next kernel tree. The linaro-next tree is discarded and rebuilt
> from scratch by merging together a bunch of development trees on a
> regular basis. I'd like to add your up-to-date tree t
I made a l-m-c patch to add imx51 support. I need your help to review
and merge the code.
--
Regards,
Shawn
# Begin patch
=== modified file 'linaro-media-create'
--- linaro-media-create 2010-09-28 18:53:19 +
+++ linaro-media-create 2010-09-30 00:36:30 +
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
* beagle
Only one comment for now. I'll test the patch.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I made a l-m-c patch to add imx51 support. I need your help to review
> and merge the code.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shawn
>
>
> # Begin patch
> === modified file 'linaro-media-create'
> --- linaro-medi
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I made a l-m-c patch to add imx51 support. I need your help to review
> and merge the code.
Thanks!
You probably want to use the board name, mx51evk, not the SoC name,
imx51; this also avoids mixing mx51 (kernel flavor) and imx51 (DEVNAME)
in the scri
Hello, I have been lurking here and on irc for a while and felt like it was
time to introduce myself.
I have a BB-C4 with all the trimmings and have been booting SD flash with
the daily builds and trying different configurations. I have also signed up
for weekly testing on the BB.
>From the wiki
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 15:45 +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> IMHO, as we continuously add support for more platforms and even more
> boards,
> it will become untenable to maintain these wiki pages. Something
> similar to
> 'testdrive' for Ubuntu is required for the next cycle.
>
> Why can't l-m-c ask
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Scott Bambrough
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 15:45 +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> IMHO, as we continuously add support for more platforms and even more
>> boards,
>> it will become untenable to maintain these wiki pages. Something
>> similar to
>> 'testdrive' for
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:27:48 +0300, Amit Kucheria
wrote:
> And with the right packaging, upgrades to linaro-testdrive will
> continually add support for new platforms and boards.
That will require some changes to l-m-c as well, to allow us to specify
board customisations, rather than hardcoding
Official proposal for stakeholder process for the following idea.
Anyone can contribute.
Summary
--
Amit Kucheria has suggested we create a script called linaro-testdrive
to ease the knowledge required to download images and create bootable
media.
In his opinion as we continuously add s
I'm working on building in ARM cross compile support to the Ubuntu
kernel packaging. I am encountering the following error:
fakeroot debian/rules binary-omap arch=armel
.
dh_gencontrol -plinux-image-2.6.35-22-omap
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'amd64' does not
appear in p
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:33:59AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> I'm working on building in ARM cross compile support to the Ubuntu
> kernel packaging. I am encountering the following error:
> fakeroot debian/rules binary-omap arch=armel
> .
> dh_gencontrol -plinux-image-2.6.35-22-omap
> dpkg-g
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> > Indeed. And that's exactly what I'm looking for in order to produce the
> > linaro-next kernel tree. The linaro-next tree is discarded and rebuilt
> > from scratch by merging together a bunch of development trees
On 09/29/2010 10:59 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:33:59AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
>> I'm working on building in ARM cross compile support to the Ubuntu
>> kernel packaging. I am encountering the following error:
>
>> fakeroot debian/rules binary-omap arch=armel
>> .
>
All,
I've created a wiki page at https://wiki.linaro.org/LiveHelper/Hacking
to describe the various steps for building your own linaro images on
arm hardware using live helper. This also includes the steps to
modifying seeds to add/subtrack packages to suite your own goals
whatever they might be.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Do you have an example of a package that correctly cross builds? The
> issue I'm having with the kernel is that there are some native gcc steps
> that compile tools executed during the build as well as some cross
> compile steps. If I can correctly dete
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:22:52AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> >Cross-building of Debian packages is meant to be handled by using the
> >'dpkg-buildpackage -a${target_arch}' interface. This sets the environment
> >variables shown in the output of 'dpkg-architecture -a${target_arch}'.
> Do you hav
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the
Linaro User Platforms Weekly Status meeting dated 9/29 held in
#linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 13:00 UTC.
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/WeeklyStatus/2010-09-29
Regards,
Tom (tgall_foo)
User Platforms Tea
Notes from today's Landing Team call:
https://wiki.linaro.org/LandingTeams/Meetings/2010-09-29
--Matt
=== Attendees ===
* Loïc Minier
* Matt Waddel
* Torez Smith
* Scott Bambrough
=== Agenda ===
* Action items from last meeting.
* Achievements / progress reports
* OMAP3
* Versatile
Hi,
I'm playing around with the daily snapshots.
Currently I'm using the snapshot from 20100929 on an EBVBeagle C2.
In order to see home exactly I'm cooking it you can look here:
http://ebvbeagle.blogspot.com/2010/09/linaro-on-beagle.html
It comes up more or less happily, b
2010/9/29 Arnd Bergmann :
> [Me]
>> Any hints on how to get out of this and create a simple
>> git tree or set of trees is welcome, I have yet not found
>> any.
>
> I think you need to stop basing on top of linux-next and
> move to basing on top of the smallest possible set of trees
> other than m
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The big hit from using Nicolas tree will rather be that it is
> 2.6.35-based, while we have a lot of stuff merged for
> 2.6.36 and a similar pile of stuff stacked in different next
> trees so I will have to pull all of that out (including some
> extensio
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:07:27AM -0400, Scott Bambrough wrote:
> This script should ask some basic questions and just do the right
> thing. This should be a separate script from linaro-media-create.
>
> Questions would be:
> - What SoC?
> - What board?
> - What release (milestone)?
> - Imag
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:21:54PM +0300, Robert Berger wrote:
> In order to see home exactly I'm cooking it you can look here:
> http://ebvbeagle.blogspot.com/2010/09/linaro-on-beagle.html
Oh, this is pretty neat. Thanks for the post!
> It comes up more or less happily, but as soon as I connect
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> What does lsusb tell you?
>
> I have a similar problem, but ironically with Angstrom on my IGEPv2. It
> says this when nothing is plugged in:
>
> r...@igep0020:~# lsusb
> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
> Bus 002 Device 001: I
Hi,
Le 30/09/2010 02:42, Christian Robottom Reis a écrit :
> I have a similar problem, but ironically with Angstrom on my IGEPv2. It
> says this when nothing is plugged in:
>
> r...@igep0020:~# lsusb
> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
>
> If I plug
Hi,
On 09/30/2010 03:42 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:21:54PM +0300, Robert Berger wrote:
>> In order to see home exactly I'm cooking it you can look here:
>> http://ebvbeagle.blogspot.com/2010/09/linaro-on-beagle.html
>
> Oh, this is pretty neat. Thanks for the
Hi,
On 09/30/2010 04:03 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 30/09/2010 02:42, Christian Robottom Reis a écrit :
>> I have a similar problem, but ironically with Angstrom on my IGEPv2. It
>> says this when nothing is plugged in:
>>
>> r...@igep0020:~# lsusb
>> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b
Hi Tom,
Thanks for guiding the package manipulation. I'm building mx51
headless hwpack image on mx51evk. Though I can make local changes to
get it work, I'm wondering when the lh headless config trunk will have
mx51 hwpack support in there.
--
Regards,
Shawn
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:48 AM, T
Thanks for reviewing and helping. I addressed the the comments with
the updated patch, except the following ones.
>> @@ -371,10 +385,17 @@
>>
>> # Create a VFAT or FAT16 partition of 9 cylinders which is about 64M
>> # and a linux partition of the rest
>> + if [ "$DEVIMAGE" = imx51 ]; then
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:07:27AM -0400, Scott Bambrough wrote:
>> This script should ask some basic questions and just do the right
>> thing. This should be a separate script from linaro-media-create.
>>
>> Questions would be:
>>
35 matches
Mail list logo
