On 09/09/2012 11:40 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Andy Green wrote:
On 09/05/12 17:19, the mail apparently from Andy Green included:
On 09/04/12 12:13, the mail apparently from Ricardo Salveti included:
Hi -
1) Can we have linux stable point release content in
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> On 09/05/12 17:19, the mail apparently from Andy Green included:
>
>> On 09/04/12 12:13, the mail apparently from Ricardo Salveti included:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
1) Can we have linux stable point release content in tilt-3.4?
Rather than
my
On 09/05/12 17:19, the mail apparently from Andy Green included:
On 09/04/12 12:13, the mail apparently from Ricardo Salveti included:
Hi -
1) Can we have linux stable point release content in tilt-3.4?
Rather than
my doing it, isn't it better to add it to llc-3.4 and merge it on the lt
histor
On 09/04/12 12:13, the mail apparently from Ricardo Salveti included:
Hi -
1) Can we have linux stable point release content in tilt-3.4? Rather than
my doing it, isn't it better to add it to llc-3.4 and merge it on the lt
history tree periodically? That way every lt can get them from one pla
Hey,
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> Hi -
>
> We've been getting some good mileage from the llct-based tilt-3.4 history
> tree the last months.
>
> However a couple of points have been raised by TI which really boil down to
> being about the deal with llct post-release. We k
Hi -
We've been getting some good mileage from the llct-based tilt-3.4
history tree the last months.
However a couple of points have been raised by TI which really boil down
to being about the deal with llct post-release. We know that it goes on
mutating and tracking as it should, but the r
