On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> So I've been talking to our customers (10 at last count) and they
> really like what we're doing. There are three things that are getting
> in their way:
>
> linaro-android-media-create
>
> GCC4.6
>
> frequent kernel upgrades
>
> They love our
[resending replying to the list , aplogies Ricardo!]
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 23:32:00 -0200, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> While I see that it's useful for people to use the outcome of the
> Android team to create products, I believe it's quite hard to keep
> both stable and unstable with the goals and th
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Bharathi Subramanian
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I feel, Linaro should maintain only 2 versions - stable and unstable
>> external source. instead of maintain staging, tracking, landing,
>> mainline etc .. I underst
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Bharathi Subramanian
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I feel, Linaro should maintain only 2 versions - stable and unstable
> external source. instead of maintain staging, tracking, landing,
> mainline etc .. I understand internally lot of activities may happen
> with partners. But
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 04:00:32PM +0800, Bharathi Subramanian wrote:
> I feel, Linaro should maintain only 2 versions - stable and unstable
> external source. instead of maintain staging, tracking, landing,
> mainline etc
Generally, I agree that only two versions must be enough.
> Is there any p
Hi,
I feel, Linaro should maintain only 2 versions - stable and unstable
external source. instead of maintain staging, tracking, landing,
mainline etc .. I understand internally lot of activities may happen
with partners. But for external people, it is should be simple. As of
now, only people who
On 31 January 2012 21:54, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>
>> On 31 January 2012 15:01, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> > You just can't have it both ways. If you focus on a stable platform
>> > then you cannot have the latest features. If you develop new features,
>> >
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 31 January 2012 15:01, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > You just can't have it both ways. If you focus on a stable platform
> > then you cannot have the latest features. If you develop new features,
> > it obviously can't be stable. But whatever you do, cu
On 31 January 2012 21:17, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 31 January 2012 15:01, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>
>>> On 31 January 2012 11:19, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> They love our builds, but they'd really lik
On 31 January 2012 15:01, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>
>> On 31 January 2012 11:19, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> >
>> >> They love our builds, but they'd really like it if they could get
>> >> stock AOSP builds for thei
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 31 January 2012 11:19, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> >
> >> They love our builds, but they'd really like it if they could get
> >> stock AOSP builds for their boards on stable kernels that they can
> >> work with
I should clarify a little. There are different types of customers. Our
main customers are our members. For our members upgraded kernels and
GCC4.6 allow them to accelerate their delivery.
The customers I've been talking to are actually using our builds to
make stuff. They're the small start-up or
On 31 January 2012 11:19, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>
>> They love our builds, but they'd really like it if they could get
>> stock AOSP builds for their boards on stable kernels that they can
>> work with using fastboot that have been CI tested and QA'd.
>>
>
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> They love our builds, but they'd really like it if they could get
> stock AOSP builds for their boards on stable kernels that they can
> work with using fastboot that have been CI tested and QA'd.
>
> I'm not advocating for the wholesale destruction of o
Oh one more thing...
Our customers actually prefer to build our distro's from source and
not get binary drops.
On 31 January 2012 10:52, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> So I've been talking to our customers (10 at last count) and they
> really like what we're doing. There are three things that are getting
So I've been talking to our customers (10 at last count) and they
really like what we're doing. There are three things that are getting
in their way:
linaro-android-media-create
GCC4.6
frequent kernel upgrades
They love our builds, but they'd really like it if they could get
stock AOSP builds f
16 matches
Mail list logo
