On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> I'm seeing some speculations wrt increased effort and would like to help
> finding solutions if there is actually a problem.
I'm seeing mainly the same thing: solutions looking for a problem. :)
I guess the only remaining chat is about security su
hi,
Am Montag, den 15.11.2010, 08:53 -0700 schrieb John Rigby:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Folks, I think this thread is circling a bit back to itself, perhaps
> > summarizing where we stand and what problems we're trying to solve
> > would help?
> >
> >
> > * Lin
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, John Rigby wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Proposed plan:
> > * Oliver/Ricardo to confirm with Ubuntu Security Team whether it's ok
> > to base Ubuntu ARM images on linux-linaro tree as constructed
> > currently
> I can't speak for the U
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, David Rusling wrote:
> Good discussion. Stupid question - what is the Ubuntu sauce? I'll
> ask the kernel dudes in their meeting in two minutes...
Some Ubuntu specific patches are prefixed by "SAUCE" in their subject
line / commit message, but the Ubuntu Sauce we refer
For what it's worth, I agree with Kiko's statement. We have three
stakeholders - internal use of the kernel by Linaro, external use by
distributions (such as Ubuntu) and external use by community. We need to
position ourselves appropriately...
Dave
On 15 Nov 2010, at 15:57, John Rigby wrot
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 03:05:20AM -0200, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Nicolas Pitre
>> wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>> >> Th
Good discussion. Stupid question - what is the Ubuntu sauce? I'll ask the
kernel dudes in their meeting in two minutes...
Dave
On 15 Nov 2010, at 15:53, John Rigby wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> Folks, I think this thread is circling a bit back to itself,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Folks, I think this thread is circling a bit back to itself, perhaps
> summarizing where we stand and what problems we're trying to solve
> would help?
>
>
> * Linaro integrates its kernel tree into Ubuntu for two reasons:
> - because Lin
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 03:05:20AM -0200, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> >> That's understandable. Now the question is why John is maintaining and
> >
Folks, I think this thread is circling a bit back to itself, perhaps
summarizing where we stand and what problems we're trying to solve
would help?
* Linaro integrates its kernel tree into Ubuntu for two reasons:
- because Linaro uses Ubuntu as a base to build its own derived
images (
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Nicolas Pitre
wrote:
>>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>> That's understandable. Now the question is why John is maintaining and
>> packaging a tree that also incorporate the Ubuntu sauce on it?
>
> I think
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> >
> >> hi,
> >> Am Montag, den 08.11.2010, 15:46 + schrieb Jamie Bennett:
> >> > > * linaro kernels used in ubuntu ARM would need to move to th
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>
>> hi,
>> Am Montag, den 08.11.2010, 15:46 + schrieb Jamie Bennett:
>> > > * linaro kernels used in ubuntu ARM would need to move to the
>> > > supported
>> > > package set (main) which makes the
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> Am Montag, den 08.11.2010, 15:46 + schrieb Jamie Bennett:
> > > * linaro kernels used in ubuntu ARM would need to move to the
> > > supported
> > > package set (main) which makes them fall under all freeze restrictions
> > > the kernel team s
hi,
Am Montag, den 08.11.2010, 15:46 + schrieb Jamie Bennett:
> > * linaro kernels used in ubuntu ARM would need to move to the
> > supported
> > package set (main) which makes them fall under all freeze restrictions
> > the kernel team sets for ubuntu (only SRUs post kernel freeze, patches
>
Oliver,
On the subject of Ubuntu sauce and security patches, at each linaro
kernel release I merge in the latest Ubuntu release so I believe the
linaro packaged kernel has all these. My current plan is to continue
doing to track the Ubuntu kernel as long as the Ubuntu kernel is
supported.
On th
Hi Oliver,
Answers in-line below.
On 8 Nov 2010, at 15:12, Oliver Grawert wrote:
hi,
at UDS we discussed the possibility of using linaro kernels for some
of
the ubuntu ARM flavours (currently for omap3 images but there might be
more to come) where we seem to have duplicated efforts in kern
17 matches
Mail list logo
