BTW, I don't think it was explicitly in the phoronix article, but the
actual source for omapdrm is at drivers/staging/omapdrm.
cheers,
Jesse
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Jesse Barker wrote:
> OK, so with respect to that article, we've been working with our
> members to provide KMS drivers fo
Thanks for the references!
-Ilyes
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Jesse Barker wrote:
> OK, so with respect to that article, we've been working with our
> members to provide KMS drivers for their SoCs. The results are in
> varying states of completeness and availability, but I would expect
> t
Thanks for the references!
-Ilyes
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Jesse Barker wrote:
> OK, so with respect to that article, we've been working with our
> members to provide KMS drivers for their SoCs. The results are in
> varying states of completeness and availability, but I would expect
> t
OK, so with respect to that article, we've been working with our
members to provide KMS drivers for their SoCs. The results are in
varying states of completeness and availability, but I would expect
that to improve in the coming cycles. You should be able to find DRM
drivers for pandaboard (omapd
Hi Jesse,
Here: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTI0MA and
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2011-March/000855.html
It doesn't propose a unified interface for 2D accelerators on SoCs, though.
> There's nothing I'm aware of that would define what you are askin
Can you point out the article you're referring to that mentioned the
Linaro project?
There's nothing I'm aware of that would define what you are asking
(apart from the Xserver's EXA framework which certainly isn't new or
in the kernel). Even the interfaces exported by DRM require user
space code
Hi Christian,
Yes dma-buf is part of the picture, but rather if any work has been
done to define an interface for the device itself, not the buffers.
I do know that these are mostly managed from user-space for
performance reasons, however I was curious to see if anything has been
in the works for
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:18:17PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> I've previously read (probably on Phoronix) that Linaro is working out
> a 'standard' kernel interface for 2D blitters IPs as commonly found on
> SoCs.
>
> Has it ever been the case? If yes, are there any
> documentation/references onl
Hi,
I've previously read (probably on Phoronix) that Linaro is working out
a 'standard' kernel interface for 2D blitters IPs as commonly found on
SoCs.
Has it ever been the case? If yes, are there any
documentation/references online?
Thanks,
-Ilyes
_
