+++ Robert Schwebel [2010-09-03 09:20 +0200]:
[sorry - got the emdebian email wrong on previous mail - reply to
this, not that]
[Emdebian people: this is useful thread from linaro-dev I am now
cross-posting. Start here to read it:
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2010-September/000657
+++ Robert Schwebel [2010-09-03 09:20 +0200]:
> I would like to test what the Debian guys have available. Can you point
> me to the right entry point? There seem to be too much Debian cross
> efforts out there and it is dificult for people from the outside to find
> the right things.
Right now t
+++ Robert Schwebel [2010-09-03 09:41 +0200]:
> Hi,
>
>
> In OSELAS.Toolchain, we have a set of flags integrated into each
> toolchain, so for example for arm-v4t-linux-gnueabi, it generates v4t
> code with software floating point without any further flags. I agree on
> that it would be a goal to
Hi,
>
> Things I can think of, but I don't know how important they are:
> - being able to easily change the default toolchain build flags (how do
> you get the toolchain? which flags do you use?)
> - being able to easily drop patches into the toolchain (how do you get
> the toolchain? whi
> "Robert" == Robert Schwebel writes:
Hi,
Robert> Wearing my embedded linux developer hat, I really like your
Robert> idea. We use Debian all over the place, and if it contains
Robert> solid cross toolchains for the ARM/PowerPC/SH/Blackfin/x86
Robert> targets we are working with I'm real
Hi,
Loïc Minier wrote:
> I'd like to understand your use cases to make sure we're on track to
> cover them. First, we're trying to maintain a toolchain source tree
> which is adequately patched; that's mostly launchpad.net/gcc-linaro
> right now. Second, we're integrating that into the native Ubun
Dnia piątek, 3 września 2010 o 09:20:51 Robert Schwebel napisał(a):
> I would like to test what the Debian guys have available. Can you point
> me to the right entry point? There seem to be too much Debian cross
> efforts out there and it is dificult for people from the outside to find
> the right
Hi Wookey,
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 10:21:24PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> I've been trying to tell embedded engineers not to build a new
> toolchain for every single project for some years now, but I've met a
> fair amount of resistance to the idea.
Wearing my embedded linux developer hat, I really li
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010, Jon Smirl wrote:
> What I'd like to do is install a pre-built cross tools chain (x86 to
> ARM) that works with the common CPU archs. Currently I am working with
> v4t, 926, ARM11, etc. Right now I have to have a separate build
> environment for every dev system I am using. Som
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:56:49PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Obviously there has to be a middle ground. We're building the binary
> packages for the configuration Dave mentioned (v7A/Neon), but IMHO
> that shouldn't prevent anyone from rebuilding it with our tool chain
> without having to make
+++ Jon Smirl [2010-09-02 13:17 -0400]:
> As an embedded developer I'd like to see a standardized tool chain for
> building on most ARM architectures. There are at least two groups of
> users for this tool chain - ARM based PCs and embedded systems. There
> are dozens are various tool chain build s
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> As an embedded developer I'd like to see a standardized tool chain for
>> building on most ARM architectures. There are at least two groups of
>> users for this tool chain - ARM based PCs and embedded sy
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010, Jon Smirl wrote:
> As an embedded developer I'd like to see a standardized tool chain for
> building on most ARM architectures. There are at least two groups of
> users for this tool chain - ARM based PCs and embedded systems. There
> are dozens are various tool chain build sy
Agree, whilst v7A is our priority, we need to 'do the right thing' for everyone
Save
Sent from my iPhone
On 2 Sep 2010, at 18:17, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wednesday 01 September 2010, Michael Hope wrote:
>>
>>> We will try to do no harm t
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 September 2010, Michael Hope wrote:
>
>> We will try to do no harm to other architectures or earlier ARM
>> versions. The Thumb-2 routines may be applicable to the Cortex-M and
>> Cortex-R series but we will not optimise for
On Wednesday 01 September 2010, Michael Hope wrote:
> We will try to do no harm to other architectures or earlier ARM
> versions. The Thumb-2 routines may be applicable to the Cortex-M and
> Cortex-R series but we will not optimise for them.
>
> I'd like Linaro to state this explicitly in the ne
It is, see the original requirements. You have it correct, ARMv7A + vfp +
neon...
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
On 31 Aug 2010, at 23:03, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. We've been having a discussion in the Toolchain WG
> regarding Thumb-1 improvements. I want to decline doing them as I've
>
Hi there. We've been having a discussion in the Toolchain WG
regarding Thumb-1 improvements. I want to decline doing them as I've
assumed that Linaro is focused on the Cortex-A series, but I can't
find that written down anywhere.
May I limit the Toolchain WG to currently or nearly shipping Corte
18 matches
Mail list logo
