On 21 February 2013 16:34, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> I don't have a strong preference one way or another about switching
> from linaro-dev to linaro-kernel.
>
> Don't forget to update
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/Git/GitSendEmail
Done.
___
l
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 18 February 2013 23:50, Serge Broslavsky
> wrote:
>> On 18.02.13 12:20 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>> For the record, I think what Peter is suggesting is reasonable. There
>>> must be better ways for people to find out what Linaro is par
On 18 February 2013 23:50, Serge Broslavsky wrote:
> On 18.02.13 12:20 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> For the record, I think what Peter is suggesting is reasonable. There
>> must be better ways for people to find out what Linaro is participating in
>> other than scaring them away from linaro-dev
On 18.02.13 12:20 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>
> > Since Peter and I were discussing this on IRC that led to this email,
> > here is a bit of context on the current behaviour:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Peter Maydell
> > wrote:
> > > Hi
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Since Peter and I were discussing this on IRC that led to this email,
> here is a bit of context on the current behaviour:
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
> > Hi; does anybody else think it would be a good idea to move all
Since Peter and I were discussing this on IRC that led to this email,
here is a bit of context on the current behaviour:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi; does anybody else think it would be a good idea to move all
> the kernel patch email traffic off linaro-dev and onto
