On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> [Me]
>> 1) The need to configure per-pin "stuff" like biasing, driving,
>> load capacitance ... whatever
I sent of a proposal for this so we get somewhere...
>> 2) The need to handle state transitions of pinmux settings.
Still uncertain
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:51:11AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Shawn Guo wrote at Friday, October 14, 2011 9:12 PM:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:53:33AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> ...
> > > Having the driver expose a list of all possible combinations of pin
> > > configurations seems impra
Linus Walleij wrote at Monday, October 17, 2011 9:03 AM:
> Thanks for a long letter, took som time to read, but as usual it
> contains good stuff!
>
> I think you're talking about two things here:
>
> 1) The need to configure per-pin "stuff" like biasing, driving,
> load capacitance ... whateve
Shawn Guo wrote at Friday, October 14, 2011 9:12 PM:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:53:33AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
...
> > Having the driver expose a list of all possible combinations of pin
> > configurations seems impractical, for the same reason as I objected to
> > the original proposal for
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> [Stephen]
>> I've started to look at porting the Tegra pinmux driver to your pinctrl
>> subsystem. In order to replace the existing pinmux driver, I need a way
>> to support configuring options such as tri-state, pull-up/down, drive-
>> strength,
Thanks for a long letter, took som time to read, but as usual it
contains good stuff!
I think you're talking about two things here:
1) The need to configure per-pin "stuff" like biasing, driving,
load capacitance ... whatever
2) The need to handle state transitions of pinmux settings.
I prefe
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:53:33AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Shawn Guo wrote at Friday, October 14, 2011 8:59 AM:
> > It might be a good place for me to catch up the pinctrl subsystem
> > discussion, as far as imx migration concerned.
> >
> > I have not read the backlog of all the previous di
Shawn Guo wrote at Friday, October 14, 2011 8:59 AM:
> It might be a good place for me to catch up the pinctrl subsystem
> discussion, as far as imx migration concerned.
>
> I have not read the backlog of all the previous discussion, so please
> excuse me if something I put here have been discusse
It might be a good place for me to catch up the pinctrl subsystem
discussion, as far as imx migration concerned.
I have not read the backlog of all the previous discussion, so please
excuse me if something I put here have been discussed.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 01:59:55PM -0700, Stephen Warren wr
