Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Ok, some questions for the meeting. Actually, if we can answer these > > > we may not need a meeting. > > I agree. We have too many meetings already. This stuff can surely be > > dealt by email? > > Nic

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010, John Rigby wrote: > Only thing left is the u-boot package trees. Could they live in > jcrigby as well? Would be consistent -- Loïc Minier ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/l

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread John Rigby
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> > Ok, some questions for the meeting.  Actually, if we can answer these >> > we may not need a meeting. >> I agree.  We have too many meetings already. This stuff can surely be >> dealt by email? >

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Ok, some questions for the meeting. Actually, if we can answer these > > we may not need a meeting. > I agree. We have too many meetings already. This stuff can surely be > dealt by email? Nicolas, I was mostly piggybacking on the release process

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, John Rigby wrote: > Ok, some questions for the meeting. Actually, if we can answer these > we may not need a meeting. I agree. We have too many meetings already. This stuff can surely be dealt by email? > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > > On Thu, Au

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread John Rigby
Ok, some questions for the meeting. Actually, if we can answer these we may not need a meeting. On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010, John Rigby wrote: >> I have moved the linux-linaro, linux-meta-linaro and u-boot-linaro git >> trees on git.linaro.org out f

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote: > Since moving these trees means people that have already cloned the trees need > to go fix their .git/config, might I suggest one more change? When moving trees, consider adding a symlink on git.linaro.org for this case. -- Loïc Minier _

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010, John Rigby wrote: > I have moved the linux-linaro, linux-meta-linaro and u-boot-linaro git > trees on git.linaro.org out from under my directory to their own > directories to make it obvious that they are official trees and not my > personal development trees. This creates c

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-20 Thread John Rigby
Great idea, I'll do that. On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On 10 Aug 19, John Rigby wrote: >> I have moved the linux-linaro, linux-meta-linaro and u-boot-linaro git >> trees on git.linaro.org out from under my directory to their own >> directories to make it obvious that th

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-20 Thread Amit Kucheria
On 10 Aug 19, John Rigby wrote: > I have moved the linux-linaro, linux-meta-linaro and u-boot-linaro git > trees on git.linaro.org out from under my directory to their own > directories to make it obvious that they are official trees and not my > personal development trees. > > The lnux and linux