Re: Unable to build linux-linaro-tracking (3.4) with CPU_IDLE

2012-06-26 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On 06/26/2012 06:51 PM, John Rigby wrote: This is done. llt-20120626.0 should be ok (build tested with CPU_IDLE enabled). BTW, compared to the previous llt-20120613.0, llt-20120626.0 has vexpress support, and (as a side effect of adding vexpress) gator upgraded from 5.10.0 to 5.10.1. I will

Re: Unable to build linux-linaro-tracking (3.4) with CPU_IDLE

2012-06-26 Thread John Rigby
> > > This is done. llt-20120626.0 should be ok (build tested with CPU_IDLE > enabled). > BTW, compared to the previous llt-20120613.0, llt-20120626.0 has vexpress > support, and (as a side effect of adding vexpress) gator upgraded from > 5.10.0 to 5.10.1. > > I will add an llt-vexpress-3.4 kernel

Re: Unable to build linux-linaro-tracking (3.4) with CPU_IDLE

2012-06-26 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Hey Ricardo, On 06/26/2012 05:30 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote: Hey Andrey, While looking on publishing the kernel packages for Ubuntu based on llt, we noticed that it's unable to build in case CPU_IDLE is enabled. This is basically because it seems one patch is applied twice, and both adding the