Re: Likely empty space in a processes's virtual address space

2011-04-14 Thread Dave Martin
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Dave Martin writes: >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Michael Hope >> wrote: >>> Hi there.  The address space randomisation feature in 2.6.35 and above >>> kernels breaks GCC's precompiled headers support.  GCC works by >>> compili

Re: Likely empty space in a processes's virtual address space

2011-04-14 Thread Richard Sandiford
Dave Martin writes: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Michael Hope > wrote: >> Hi there.  The address space randomisation feature in 2.6.35 and above >> kernels breaks GCC's precompiled headers support.  GCC works by >> compiling the header once, dumping the internal format out to disk, >> and

Re: Likely empty space in a processes's virtual address space

2011-04-14 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Michael Hope wrote: > Hi there.  The address space randomisation feature in 2.6.35 and above > kernels breaks GCC's precompiled headers support.  GCC works by > compiling the header once, dumping the internal format out to disk, > and then mmap()ing it back in at

Re: Likely empty space in a processes's virtual address space

2011-04-13 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Michael Hope wrote: > Hi there. The address space randomisation feature in 2.6.35 and above > kernels breaks GCC's precompiled headers support. GCC works by > compiling the header once, dumping the internal format out to disk, > and then mmap()ing it back in at a fixed addre