Re: IGEPv2 kernel changes

2010-08-26 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Michael Hope wrote: > > hmm. Those should have been in initramfs iirc. I assume you did not > install > > the kernel as a package? > > Correct. I'm afraid I'm doing things in a random way. > Out of interest, where would the initramfs go in NAND? > > You could che

Re: IGEPv2 kernel changes

2010-08-25 Thread Michael Hope
> hmm. Those should have been in initramfs iirc. I assume you did not install > the kernel as a package? Correct. I'm afraid I'm doing things in a random way. Out of interest, where would the initramfs go in NAND? -- Michael ___ linaro-dev mailing li

Re: IGEPv2 kernel changes

2010-08-24 Thread Alexander Sack
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Michael Hope wrote: > Hi there. I got two new IGEPv2 boards over the weekend. They're now > happily running linux-linaro 2.6.35-1001.5. > > I made the following changes: > * Statically link USB mass storage support so that I can use my USB > HDD as a rootfs >

Re: IGEPv2 kernel changes

2010-08-24 Thread Michael Hope
The fixed phy is a blocker - you can't modprobe the network driver with it turned on. -- Michael On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:39:03AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote: >> Hi there.  I got two new IGEPv2 boards over the weekend.  They're no

Re: IGEPv2 kernel changes

2010-08-24 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:39:03AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote: > Hi there. I got two new IGEPv2 boards over the weekend. They're now > happily running linux-linaro 2.6.35-1001.5. > > I made the following changes: [...] > * Turn off CONFIG_FIXED_PHY to prevent a sysfs conflict with the > network