On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Scott Bambrough
wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 11:17 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
>> Sincle I believe this is a known issue with the hardware, it could be
>> wise to streamline the putting of bootloader and filesystem on
>> separate devices.
[...]
>> Is this feasib
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 11:17 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Sincle I believe this is a known issue with the hardware, it could be
> wise to streamline the putting of bootloader and filesystem on
> separate devices.
>
> Manually at least, this wasn't too hard: I ran linaro-media-create,
> copied the bo
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
[...]
>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:13:40PM +0100, Harry Liebel wrote:
I've had mixed results. When the box completes the boot the basic systems
seem to work ok (I can get an IP and poke the filesystem). It still takes
sever
On 11 Oct 2010, at 23:08, Matt Waddel wrote:
> Hi Jamie,
>
> On 10/11/2010 03:03 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:13:40PM +0100, Harry Liebel wrote:
>>> I've had mixed results. When the box completes the boot the basic systems
>>> seem to work ok (I can get an IP and poke
Hi Jamie,
On 10/11/2010 03:03 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:13:40PM +0100, Harry Liebel wrote:
>> I've had mixed results. When the box completes the boot the basic systems
>> seem to work ok (I can get an IP and poke the filesystem). It still takes
>> several minutes to g
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:13:40PM +0100, Harry Liebel wrote:
> I've had mixed results. When the box completes the boot the basic systems
> seem to work ok (I can get an IP and poke the filesystem). It still takes
> several minutes to get to a prompt as mentioned on the wiki page.
>
> It happens
