On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 07:16:56PM +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 12:45 -0600, Xianghua Xiao wrote:
> > where does it mandate 3G/1G in Android?
> >
> > we're planning to use 2G/2G split as well, but I'm unaware of the
> > 3G/1G requirement in Android, seems odd to me.
>
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 12:45 -0600, Xianghua Xiao wrote:
> where does it mandate 3G/1G in Android?
>
> we're planning to use 2G/2G split as well, but I'm unaware of the
> 3G/1G requirement in Android, seems odd to me.
I think there are some user libraries (bionic?, dalvik?) which are hard
coded to
where does it mandate 3G/1G in Android?
we're planning to use 2G/2G split as well, but I'm unaware of the
3G/1G requirement in Android, seems odd to me.
Thanks,
Xianghua
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 15:44 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
>> but yo
Hello,
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 4:45 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 December 2011, Andy Green wrote:
> > but your suggestion is more elegant. I'm unsure of the ramifications of
> > the 2G / 2G scheme so I'll give it a try later.
>
> WFIW, the main reason why people don't want the
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 15:44 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> but your suggestion is more elegant. I'm unsure of the ramifications of
> the 2G / 2G scheme so I'll give it a try later.
Android requires a 3G/1G split. (That may, or may not be relevent.)
--
Tixy
___
On Tuesday 20 December 2011, Andy Green wrote:
> but your suggestion is more elegant. I'm unsure of the ramifications of
> the 2G / 2G scheme so I'll give it a try later.
WFIW, the main reason why people don't want the 2G/2G split is to allow
user space application to grow to 3GB instead of limi
On 12/20/2011 03:38 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
Is it expected CMA and high memory should work OK? I see there's a note
in the CMA log about "implement support for contiguous memory areas
placed in HIGHMEM zone", but it's ambiguous if it should be ignoring
highmem or is
Hello Andy,
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 2:56 AM You wrote:
> I recently brought in v 15 (and then v 17) of the CMA patches on
> tilt-tracking and backported to tilt-3.1 in order to support Panda
> onboard camera.
>
> Without any highmem, stuff is working great, but with HIGHMEM, inclusion
> of
