On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Grant Likely
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 07 2011, David Gilbert wrote:
>>> I'm curious; do we have any interaction with the autotest project
>>> - it seems it's whole point is automated kernel testing,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, Apr 07 2011, David Gilbert wrote:
>> I'm curious; do we have any interaction with the autotest project
>> - it seems it's whole point is automated kernel testing,.
>> http://autotest.kernel.org/ and test.kernel.org
>
> test.
Hi David,
On Thu, Apr 07 2011, David Gilbert wrote:
> I'm curious; do we have any interaction with the autotest project
> - it seems it's whole point is automated kernel testing,.
> http://autotest.kernel.org/ and test.kernel.org
test.kernel.org hasn't done anything since around 2.6.36 -- I think
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:24 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
> I'm curious; do we have any interaction with the autotest project - it
> seems it's whole point is automated kernel testing,.
> http://autotest.kernel.org/ and test.kernel.org
I did some looking at it, but what we are trying to provide is much
I'm curious; do we have any interaction with the autotest project - it
seems it's whole point is automated kernel testing,.
http://autotest.kernel.org/ and test.kernel.org
Dave
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.
Hi Chris, we actually have a project in progress called LAVA to do something
very similar to this. Our initial target is to test full linaro images and
hardware packs, however we are also very interested in extending this to
include running with just an updated kernel in a known good image to test
