On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
>> Hi there. I have a style question. For the pre-built versions of
>> gcc-linaro, should we release a i686 version that also runs on x86_64,
>> or do separate i686 and x86_64 builds?
>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. I have a style question. For the pre-built versions of
> gcc-linaro, should we release a i686 version that also runs on x86_64,
> or do separate i686 and x86_64 builds?
>
> If we do just an i686 version then:
> * There's less to t
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. I have a style question. For the pre-built versions of
> gcc-linaro, should we release a i686 version that also runs on x86_64,
> or do separate i686 and x86_64 builds?
>
> If we do just an i686 version then:
> * There's less to t
