Hi Nico,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> OK. Will the debugfs format be identical and will this work identically
> from a user space point of view once this is based on top of the common
> clock API? If yes then I'm happy to merge it into the Linaro kernel
> tree.
Yes, th
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Yong Shen wrote:
> Hi Amit and Nico,
>
> > For the benefit of Nico, and linaro tree maintenance - what is the
> > status of this patch in mainline?
> Before posting the patch here, I tried to post it in mainline
> mail-list, (linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org). However, mx
Hi Amit and Nico,
> For the benefit of Nico, and linaro tree maintenance - what is the
> status of this patch in mainline?
Before posting the patch here, I tried to post it in mainline
mail-list, (linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org). However, mx5's
maintainer prefer to wait until common clk stru
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:50 PM, wrote:
>
> To utilize powerdebug tool developed by power management group of Linaro, we
> need this patch in kernel to expose clock information.
>
> Yong
Yong,
For the benefit of Nico, and linaro tree maintenance - what is the
status of this patch in mainline?
