Re: [PATCH v5] sdio: optimized SDIO IRQ handling for single irq

2011-06-06 Thread Daniel Mack
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Per, > > On Wed, May 11 2011, Per Forlin wrote: >> From: Stefan Nilsson XK >> >> If there is only 1 function interrupt registered it is possible to >> improve performance by directly calling the irq handler >> and avoiding the overhead of re

Re: [PATCH v5] sdio: optimized SDIO IRQ handling for single irq

2011-06-06 Thread Daniel Mack
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Chris Ball wrote: >> Hi Per, >> >> On Wed, May 11 2011, Per Forlin wrote: >>> From: Stefan Nilsson XK >>> >>> If there is only 1 function interrupt registered it is possible to >>> improve performance by direct

Re: [PATCH v5] sdio: optimized SDIO IRQ handling for single irq

2011-05-11 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Per, On Wed, May 11 2011, Per Forlin wrote: > From: Stefan Nilsson XK > > If there is only 1 function interrupt registered it is possible to > improve performance by directly calling the irq handler > and avoiding the overhead of reading the CCCR registers. > > Signed-off-by: Per Forlin > Ack