On 25 September 2012 23:17, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:06:07PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> flush_delayed_work() and flush_delayed_work_sync() had major portion of code
>> similar. This patch introduces another routine __flush_delayed_work() which
>> contains the common part to
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:06:07PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> flush_delayed_work() and flush_delayed_work_sync() had major portion of code
> similar. This patch introduces another routine __flush_delayed_work() which
> contains the common part to avoid code duplication.
This part has seen a lot