On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 10:18 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 20 June 2011 06:36 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:16 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
> >> Currently display support for omap2 is selected by default and
> >> it gets built for all the configurations.
>
Hi,
On Monday 20 June 2011 06:36 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:16 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
Currently display support for omap2 is selected by default and
it gets built for all the configurations.
Instead of it being a built-in feature, it's compilation should
depend on
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:16 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
> Currently display support for omap2 is selected by default and
> it gets built for all the configurations.
>
> Instead of it being a built-in feature, it's compilation should
> depend on the config option CONFIG_FB_OMAP2.
No, I don't think
