Re: [PATCH] regulator: MAX8997: Fix for divide by zero error

2011-07-04 Thread Liam Girdwood
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 09:08 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > Currently, ramp_delay variable is used uninitialzed in > max8997_set_voltage_ldobuck which gets called through > regulator_register calls. > > To fix the problem, in max8997_pmic_probe, ramp_delay initialization > code is moved before calls

Re: [PATCH] regulator: MAX8997: Fix for divide by zero error

2011-06-21 Thread Tushar Behera
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 08:18 AM, 함명주 wrote: > Sender : Tushar Behera > Date : 2011-06-21 12:38 (GMT+09:00) >> Currently, ramp_delay variable is used uninitialized in >> max8997_set_voltage_ldobuck which gets called through >> regulator_register calls. >> >> To fix the problem, in max8997_pmic_pr

Re: [PATCH] regulator: MAX8997: Fix for divide by zero error

2011-06-21 Thread 함명주
Sender : Tushar Behera Date : 2011-06-21 12:38 (GMT+09:00) > Currently, ramp_delay variable is used uninitialzed in > max8997_set_voltage_ldobuck which gets called through > regulator_register calls. > > To fix the problem, in max8997_pmic_probe, ramp_delay initialization > code is moved before ca

Re: [PATCH] regulator: MAX8997: Fix for divide by zero error

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:08:59AM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > Currently, ramp_delay variable is used uninitialzed in > max8997_set_voltage_ldobuck which gets called through > regulator_register calls. > To fix the problem, in max8997_pmic_probe, ramp_delay initialization > code is moved before