On 09/11/2012 02:18 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 12:45 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/10/2012 07:14 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> In the meantime, I'll try to reproduce on my T61. If you could send me
>>> your .config, I'd appreciate it.
>> http://pastebin.com/qSxqfdDK
>>
>> The header o
On 09/10/2012 11:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Would you mind testing the following patch? It seems to resolve the
issue, but I've not yet run it through my test suite to make sure it
didn't break anything else.
No problem, I will try it this evening.
Is this problem related to all 32bits arch ?
On 09/11/2012 02:18 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 12:45 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/10/2012 07:14 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> In the meantime, I'll try to reproduce on my T61. If you could send me
>>> your .config, I'd appreciate it.
>> http://pastebin.com/qSxqfdDK
>>
>> The header o
On 09/10/2012 12:45 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/10/2012 07:14 PM, John Stultz wrote:
In the meantime, I'll try to reproduce on my T61. If you could send me
your .config, I'd appreciate it.
http://pastebin.com/qSxqfdDK
The header of the config file shows for a v3.5-rc7 because it is the
res
On 09/10/2012 07:14 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 09/07/2012 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/07/2012 07:22 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> On 09/07/2012 07:20 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 11:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrot
On 09/07/2012 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/07/2012 07:22 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On 09/07/2012 07:20 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 11:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On T
On 09/07/2012 07:22 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 09/07/2012 07:20 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 11:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Dani
On 09/07/2012 07:20 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 11:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 09:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano
On 09/06/2012 11:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/06/2012 09:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 03:41 PM, R
On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 09:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 09/05/2012 03:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Saturday, September 01, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Friday, August 31, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/24/2012 11:
On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 09/06/2012 09:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>> On 09/05/2012 03:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, Septembe
On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 09:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 09/05/2012 03:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, September 01, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, August 31,
On 09/06/2012 09:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 03:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Saturday, September 01, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Friday, August 31, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/24/2012 11:06 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at
On 09/05/2012 03:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, September 01, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Friday, August 31, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 07/24/2012 11:06 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:12:29PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Remov
On Saturday, September 01, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, August 31, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 07/24/2012 11:06 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:12:29PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >> Remove the power field as it is not used.
> > >>
> > >>
On Friday, August 31, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/24/2012 11:06 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:12:29PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> Remove the power field as it is not used.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> >> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > Ac
On 07/24/2012 11:06 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:12:29PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Remove the power field as it is not used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Acked.
Hi Rafael,
I did not see this patch going in. Is it possi
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:12:29PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Remove the power field as it is not used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Acked.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c|2 --
> drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c |1 -
> include/acpi/proc
18 matches
Mail list logo