Thanks!
FYI I'm working on some new patches which I believe make it much more
robust. Plan to post something tomorrow.
Regards
-- Pantelis
On Jun 4, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 11:04 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
>> Please do a perf sched spr-replay -l -n -d -d an
On 05/31/2012 11:04 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Please do a perf sched spr-replay -l -n -d -d and send me the output.
There was a change made to the way names are recorded, and this could have
affected it.
Attached. You can also grab perf.data at http://78.153.153.8/tmp/perf.data.gz
and see w
Hi There,
On May 31, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 11:41 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
>> There are a number of problems that this patch solves.
>
> Do you have a feedback from core perf developers?
>
Not yet. I need to have some internal review first and then post.
On 05/31/2012 11:41 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
There are a number of problems that this patch solves.
Do you have a feedback from core perf developers?
1. The format used by default is the binary perf trace format which is
both non-portable between arches and non human editable. The format
