On 29 March 2012 04:20, Paul Larson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Stubbs
> wrote:
>>
>> On 28/03/12 03:26, Michael Hope wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi there. The GCC build time is approaching 24 hours and our five
>>> Panda boards can't keep up. Sounds like a good time to LAVAise the
>
On 28/03/12 16:20, Paul Larson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Stubbs
mailto:andrew.stu...@linaro.org>> wrote:
This surprised me, because I thought it was using the same rootfs
you had on the ursa boards, but I've not had time to do anything
about it yet.
Looks like s
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 28/03/12 03:26, Michael Hope wrote:
>
>> Hi there. The GCC build time is approaching 24 hours and our five
>> Panda boards can't keep up. Sounds like a good time to LAVAise the
>> toolchain build process a bit more...
>>
>
> As you know
On 28 Mar 2012, at 04:06, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. The GCC build time is approaching 24 hours and our five
> Panda boards can't keep up. Sounds like a good time to LAVAise the
> toolchain build process a bit more...
>
> Mike Hudson a
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. The GCC build time is approaching 24 hours and our five
> Panda boards can't keep up. Sounds like a good time to LAVAise the
> toolchain build process a bit more...
>
> Mike Hudson and I talked about doing a hybrid LAVA/cbuild as a
