On 18 October 2012 23:06, Steve Bannister wrote:
> That's the justification for closing the week before the release of the llct.
> What I'm asking is why we're now closing the MP branch 2 weeks before that.
Because i misread: https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles :(
I thought that the date of kernel W
That's the justification for closing the week before the release of the llct.
What I'm asking is why we're now closing the MP branch 2 weeks before that.
The proposed date of the 9th Nov is a full 3 weeks before the release on the
29th Nov. Working back from the release date that's one week for
On 18 October 2012 22:42, Steve Bannister wrote:
> Sorry guys - can I get this proposal straight in my head?
>
> 12.11 release - 29/11
> Platforms close - 22/11
> Kernel close- 15/11
> MP close- 08/11
>
> I understand the week of testing for the platforms team. I understand a week
>
orten Rasmussen;
>Andrey Konovalov
>Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bit-LITTLE-MP-v7
>
>On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 14:18 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 24 August 2012 16:39, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>>
>> > Sounds OK from my point of view, except that rather than fixed
>d
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 14:18 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 August 2012 16:39, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>
> > Sounds OK from my point of view, except that rather than fixed dates
> > each month the should probably be tied to the release dates. E.g. the
> > Monday of the week before release (
On 24 August 2012 16:39, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> Sounds OK from my point of view, except that rather than fixed dates
> each month the should probably be tied to the release dates. E.g. the
> Monday of the week before release (the normal WG cut-of date), and two
> weeks before (or after?) th
Hi Tixy,
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 22:34 +0800, Lei Wen wrote:
> > I have several questions related how to run the mp over fastmodel.
> > For the kernel config file, I see there are many for VE:
> > android_vexpress_defconfig
> > ubuntu_ve
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 22:34 +0800, Lei Wen wrote:
> I have several questions related how to run the mp over fastmodel.
> For the kernel config file, I see there are many for VE:
> android_vexpress_defconfig
> ubuntu_vexpress_defconfig
> vexpress_defconfig
> vexpress_tc2_defconfig
> Which one is sui
Tixy,
Can you please answer below queries? I am not sure about them.
--
viresh
On 6 September 2012 20:04, Lei Wen wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Viresh Kumar
> wrote:
>>
>> On 5 September 2012 19:16, Morten Rasmussen
>> wrote:
>> > The patch is already in the origina
Hi Viresh,
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 5 September 2012 19:16, Morten Rasmussen
> wrote:
> > The patch is already in the original patch set, so I'm not sure why it
> > is missing.
> >
> >
> http://linux-arm.org/git?p=arm-bls.git;a=commit;h=1416200dd62551aa9ac4aa207b
On 5 September 2012 19:16, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> The patch is already in the original patch set, so I'm not sure why it
> is missing.
>
> http://linux-arm.org/git?p=arm-bls.git;a=commit;h=1416200dd62551aa9ac4aa207b0c66651ccbff2c
>
> It needs to be there for the HMP scheduling to work.
Surpris
Hi Viresh,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 06:21:26AM +0100, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28 August 2012 10:37, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > I have updated
> >
> > https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Process/bigLittleMPTree
> >
> > as per our last discussion. Please see if i have missed somethin
On 09/03/2012 05:26 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 16:07 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Andrey,
Below is pull request for v7 of MP work. Following are the main changes:
Merged into llct-20120903.0.
- Based on v3.6-rc3
- per-task-load-average-v3
- applied
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 16:07 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Below is pull request for v7 of MP work. Following are the main changes:
> - Based on v3.6-rc3
> - per-task-load-average-v3
> - applied ARM-Add-HMP-scheduling-support-for-ARM-architecture to
> task-placement-
On 28 August 2012 10:37, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> I have updated
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Process/bigLittleMPTree
>
> as per our last discussion. Please see if i have missed something.
Hi Guys,
I will be sending PULL request of big-LITTLE-MP-v7 today as per schedule
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 10:37 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 August 2012 16:39, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > Sounds OK from my point of view, except that rather than fixed dates
> > each month the should probably be tied to the release dates. E.g. the
> > Monday of the week before release (the
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 August 2012 16:39, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>> Sounds OK from my point of view, except that rather than fixed dates
>> each month the should probably be tied to the release dates. E.g. the
>> Monday of the week before release (the no
On 24 August 2012 16:39, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> Sounds OK from my point of view, except that rather than fixed dates
> each month the should probably be tied to the release dates. E.g. the
> Monday of the week before release (the normal WG cut-of date), and two
> weeks before (or after?) tha
On 24 August 2012 07:12, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 August 2012 16:39, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>>
>> Sounds OK from my point of view, except that rather than fixed dates
>> each month the should probably be tied to the release dates. E.g. the
>> Monday of the week before release (the normal W
On 24 August 2012 16:39, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> Sounds OK from my point of view, except that rather than fixed dates
> each month the should probably be tied to the release dates. E.g. the
> Monday of the week before release (the normal WG cut-of date), and two
> weeks before (or after?) th
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 15:10 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 August 2012 14:49, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
> While our goal is to keep track of the bleeding edge, and I
> think
> you're doing a great job there, let's figure out a plan to
> minimise
> the numbe
On 24 August 2012 14:49, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> While our goal is to keep track of the bleeding edge, and I think
> you're doing a great job there, let's figure out a plan to minimise
> the number of kernel releases we make.
>
> Can you look at your previous 6 releases and their dates and figure
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 August 2012 12:32, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>>
>> Is this critical for this month's release? The release candidate builds
>> are possibly already in testing so we would have to request that they
>> are stopped and redone?
>
>
> Not s
On 24 August 2012 12:32, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> Is this critical for this month's release? The release candidate builds
> are possibly already in testing so we would have to request that they
> are stopped and redone?
>
Not sure, what is fixed in this version? Maybe Morten can tell if anyt
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 10:32 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Below is pull request for v7 of MP work, you can skip v6-resend pull
> request that i sent yesterday.
> Following are the main changes:
> - Based on v3.6-rc3
> - per-task-load-average updated with v3
> - applied T
25 matches
Mail list logo
